Kessler Beats Hopkins, No Doubt About It

[Poom]

I think Kessler would have a very good chance, infact I would pick Kessler to UD him, but the title of the article is stupid

Kessler Beats Hopkins, No Doubt About It

sure he may have a good chance, but id say there were many doubts about it,

He is bigger and a tonne more skillful than Pavlik, i think he can win.

[BIG H]

You can't compare Kessler and Pavlick in anyway. I'd pick Kessler over Hopkins to be honest!

[Pugilistic]

I feel Hopkins would beat Kessler.

The fight would be more competitive than the Pavlik fight but Kessler's style is too simple to cause bernard too many problems.

If Calzaghe could hurt Kessler i think Hopkins could hurt him much worse also.

[Tysonbruno]

This would be a good fight could be great in fact.

[Bomp]

IMO Hopkins wins this, it wasn't a good sign that against Joe Kessler got discouraged when things weren't going his way, plus he had to set his feet to land the knockout combination and Hop won't let him do that.

Saying that, he should do better than Pavlik. After watching it again I do believe that Pavlik was off his game (though I still reckon Hop could beat him with no excuses), Hopkins didn't jump on him, and i don't think it was the game plan at all to end up throwing so many punches, I think half way through the second round hop couldn't believe his luck that Pavlik was so docile and that he didn't have to revert to the hug and butt routine.

[Wayne]

This is a classic case of writing with one's heart rather than one's head. See how he contradicts himself here:

As good as Kessler looked, I doubt that Hopkins will want to take the hook and seek out a fight with him. Hopkins wants a fight with Joe Calzaghe or Roy Jones Jr., either of which would bring in much more money without all the risk that Kessler would bring to the table. I realize that Kessler has been beaten by Calzaghe, but the fight was very close and in a rematch, I’m fairly certain he would beat him. That’s why Calzaghe probably doesn’t want to face him again. As far as Kessler-Hopkins, I don’t see any reason why this fight can’t place.

Hopkins doesn't need a 'stay busy' fight. He's looking to retire next year and considering Jones-Calzaghe is only a few weeks after his fight with Pavlik there's every reason for him to be stomping to make a match with the winner of that bout next. This guy is writing as if Hopkins won't fight Kessler because Mikkel will beat him up. No, Hopkins won't fight Kessler because Americans don't know who he is. Hopkins also wants to avenge two losses in one bout. If Calzaghe wins and Hopkins beats him in the rematch, Hopkins can feel a moral victory over Jones and same thing if Jones wins. And then the obvious, a trilogy match in which he would go for 2 wins out of 3. If that match can't happen he may go for a match against Chad Dawson. IMO, this is a much more dangerous match than anything Kessler would bring. But 'Nard's ego won't tell him he can't do it. As much as this writer thinks Kelly Pavlik was too small for B-Hop, the fact of it is is Pavlik is built better for higher divisions than middleweight, his metabolism just allows him to sweat down to 160. Hopkins wants legacy-cementing fights and Kessler just doesn't bring that to the table.

Now if the fight did take place? Again, Kessler's punching power would come to nil against a guy who is flat out a defensive genius. Kessler would have to step on the gas for a full 12 rounds to make Hopkins come unwound, something only Joe Calzaghe was able to do. How this guy sees Hopkins being taken out when no one has ever been able to do that is anybody's guess. Not that I don't think Kessler could win it. I think it's possible, but I have my doubts.

[Fenster]

I wouldn't back ANYONE to "easily handle" Hopkins. I would make Kessler underdog if they fought too.

And I certainly wouldn't take much notice of that fellas opinion.

He said he thinks Kessler would beat Calzaghe in a rematch and more alarmingly Pavlik would beat Hopkins.