Great fight while it lasts but I'd have to go with Spinks. At 175 he was too strong. He was able to go up to HW, granted not a great HW but still enough strength to fight bigger/stronger men up there - not named Tyson.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Champ
Array
Re: Who would have won ? Saad Muhammad vs. Micheal Spinks
Great fight while it lasts but I'd have to go with Spinks. At 175 he was too strong. He was able to go up to HW, granted not a great HW but still enough strength to fight bigger/stronger men up there - not named Tyson.
Last edited by BlackRazor; 10-29-2008 at 04:20 PM. Reason: spelling
Circa 1985
Array
Re: Who would have won ? Saad Muhammad vs. Micheal Spinks
Well they don't call him "Miracle Saad" for nothing.
Tough call for me but if I had to pick one just on instinct I'd side with Saad.
Lifelong Miami Heat Fan
Array
Re: Who would have won ? Saad Muhammad vs. Micheal Spinks
I'd go with Spinks, obviously couldn't count out Saad but Spinks was just a better fighter IMO.
Proud Father
Array
Re: Who would have won ? Saad Muhammad vs. Micheal Spinks
Although I love Matthew Franklin A.K.A. Matthew Saad Muhammed. Spinks was invincible at light heavy. Saad was very tough a true Philadelphia warrior but Spinks was just another kind of animal. IMO Spinks stops him.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks