Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who is the best Super MIddleweight?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 78

Thread: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Caerphilly, Wales
    Posts
    1,772
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1668
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Top Ten: Super Middleweight

    Steve Farhood rates the leading fighters in the relatively short history of a division turned bigtime mainly to European boxers

    A question that has puzzled philosophers dating back to Socrates, Confucius, Aristotle, and Don King: How can a division that has flaunted world titlists such as Sugar Ray Leonard, Thomas Hearns, Roy Jones, Iran Barkley and James Toney be dominated by fighters from the UK and the rest of Europe?
    The super middleweight class is 23 years old, and there have been 41 different champions, of which only 13 have been American.
    The heart and soul of the super middleweights have been the fighters who committed to the division, made or at least solidified their reputations at 12st, and scored their most significant triumphs at the weight. For multi-division titlists like Leonard and Hearns, super middleweight was a mere pit stop. But Joe Calzaghe, Chris Eubank, Nigel Benn and Steve Collins turned a division into a prime battlefield.
    On 3 November in Cardiff, Calzaghe will clash with fellow unbeaten Mikkel Kessler in a unification bout featuring titlists with a combined record of 82-0. The outcome will impact the pound-for-pound rankings, the super middleweight rankings and the all-time division rankings.
    At a press conference announcing the fight, I asked both titlists to identify the best super middleweight of all. Calzaghe said he was number one, with Roy Jones second. Kessler said he was number one, but acknowledged that he'd have to beat Calzaghe to prove it.
    Here, then, from a writer on the wrong side of the pond (Farhood is American), are the Top 10 super middleweights in division history.

    1 ROY JONES

    Jones occupies the highest perch for three reasons: 1) He won his share of the title by masterfully outboxing James Toney, who at the time was ranked second, pound for pound; 2) He made five defences, all by stoppage, and never lost at the weight; 3) He won the title at age 25 and vacated at 28, or to put it more simply, he reigned when Roy Jones was Roy Jones, a breathtaking, unique, overwhelming talent.
    Toney aside, Jones's opposition at super middleweight wasn't memorable; his victims were Bryant Brannon, Vinny Pazienza, Antoine Byrd, Tony Thornton and Eric Lucas. Nonetheless, his performances were special. Against Paz, he won a round without absorbing a single blow.
    A bout vs fellow titlist Nigel Benn would've been intriguing, but at that point in Jones's career, he wasn't going to lose to Benn or anybody else.

    2 JOE CALZAGHE

    A 10-year title run and 20 successful defences is the stuff of legends, and the Welsh southpaw is still rolling. Should he convincingly defeat Kessler, I'll place him above Jones.
    To place the numbers in perspective, consider that among today's titlists, Calzaghe's reign is seven years longer than that of the runners-up, lightweight Juan Diaz and strawweight Yutaka niida.
    Calzaghe has been uneven. He's suffered several injuries, struggled through mediocre performances, and bested forgettable challengers, including Will McIntyre, Rick Thornberry and Tocker Pudwill. Moreover, 18 of his 20 defences have come in the UK. But the positives are sparkling: He won his first title by dethroning an itimidating presence and established titlist in Chris Eubank, rose from a devastating knockdown to stop Byron Mitchell, and schooled Jeff Lacy, who was 21-0 and labeled a mini-Tyson.
    At this point, Calzaghe is defined by his dominance over Lacy, who is dismissed as having been overrated only because of the thoroughness of Calzaghe's victory. If the left-hander defeats Kessler, we'll have to reconsider his credentials for the second time in 20 months.

    3 NIGEL BENN

    With "The Dark Destroyer", there was balance: A former belt-holder at middleweight, Benn followed nine successful defences at 12st with losses in three consecutive title bouts. Title fight wins over Mauro Galvano (twice), Lou Gent and danny Perez don't score a lot of points, but his rematch defence against arch-rival Eubank (D 12), fought before 42,000 fans at Old Trafford, was the division's most significant bout to that point, and his tragic off-the-floor stoppage of fearsome puncher Gerald McClellan was as savage a bout as any in the '90s.
    The majority of observers thought Benn nicked Eubank in their 1993 unification showdown. In fact, a point deduction for punching low cost Benn the verdict.

    4 CHRIS EUBANK
    Sadly, what McClellan was to Benn, Michael Watson was to Eubank. In one of the best fights of the decade (and one of the most dramatic turnarounds in history), Eubank won a vacant title by rising from the first knockdown of his career and immediately dropping Watson. He finished his rival early in the next round, and Watson, severly injured, never fought again.
    Eubank mad 14 successful defences. Like most long-reigning titlists, his resume includes some forgettable challenges (Mauricio Costa, John Jarvis, Sam Storey), but his draw with Benn and his points win in Germany over former and future titlist Graciano Rocchigiani, who was 35-0 at the time, elevate him over almost all other super middles.
    It was before Calzaghe's title-fight win over Eubank that the division developed its reputation as a British stronghold. And even though they fought each other only once at the weight, Eubank and Benn are responsible.

    5 JAMES TONEY
    It can be argued that at his best, Toney was a better fighter than both Benn and Eubank, but his stay at super middle was relatively short, and his horrendous points loss to Jones deserves penalty.
    What to make of Toney's title-winning stoppage of Iran Barkley? "The Blade" had twice beaten Hearns, but had also suffered a first-round KO at the hands of Benn. That aside, Toney, who always struggled to make 12st, defended against Tim Littles, who was 24-0, and comprehensively defeated Prince Charles Williams, who had reigned with distinction at light-heavyweight.
    Suffice to say that when we consider Toney's career in its entirety, only a small portion of the focus is applied to his days in this division.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Caerphilly, Wales
    Posts
    1,772
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1668
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    6 STEVE COLLINS
    Timing is essential, and for that reason, the Irishman, despite having twice beaten both Benn and Eubank, ranks below them.
    Collins caught Eubank toward the end, and both his wins over Benn, the result of injury (First fight) and curious surrender (rematch), were less than comprehensive. The back-to-back losses were the last fights of Benn's career.
    One other thing: As tough as Collins was, he wasn't the fighter his more celebrated rivals were.
    Collins made seven successful defences. Remove the three that came against Eubank and Benn and his challengers (Cornelius Carr, Neville Brown, Craig Cummings) were underwhelming. He did, however, retire with the belt, something neither Eubank nor Benn can claim to have done.

    7 SVEN OTTKE
    The German never lost a fight (34-0), but don't even suggest comparisons with Rocky Marciano, which would be grotesque and absurd.
    So how does a titlist make 21 defences, retire with two belts, and rank only seventh? Lots of reasons. For one, Ottke never defended outside of Germany. That's a lot of home cooking, which partly explains four wins by split or majority decision. For another, there's nothing special about Ottke's list of challengers. There are some quality wins (Byron Mitchell, Charles Brewer, Mads Larsen, Glen Johnson, Silvio Branco) , but nothing that suggests entry into the pound-for-pound listings.
    And let's not forget that in December '03, Ottke was given an early Christmas present when he outpointed Robin Reid.

    8 FRANKIE LILES
    The long lefty makes the list based on longevity; he made seven successful defences and reigned for the better part of five years.
    I'd argue that Liles is a bit underrated, partly because his style was often negative and partly because his reign overlapped with higher-profile titlists like Jones and Benn. Moreover, Liles lacked a defining fight. Instead, he was the consistent type, defending mostly against good fighters like his arch-rival Tim Littles.
    Liles's best win came in his first defence, against fellow southpaw and two-division titlist Michael Nunn in Ecuador. Nunn had only two losses at the time.
    That Liles, who was never the best fighter at his weight, cracks the Top 10 speaks volumes of the relative immaturity of this division. Twenty-three years isn't enough to establish a solid list of exceptional champions.

    9 CHONG PAL PARK
    The second titlist in this division's history, Park was an oddity, only because there are very few Koreans fighting in the heavier weight classes. (Interestingly, another Korean, In Chul Baek, reigned at super middleweight in the late-'80s.)
    As a two time titlist, Park made a combined nine successful defences. Eleven of his twelve world title fights took place in his homeland. He was a strong super middle, but the quality of his title fight opponents was relatively weak. For instance, Roy Gumbs and Emmanuel Otti were both coming off back-to-back losses, Indonesia's Polly Pasireron was 4-2, and Jesus Gallardo was a novice without a notable win.
    The only impressive name of Park's list of victims is Lindell Holmes, and Park barely edged the American, who was a future world titlist.

    10 MIKKEL KESSLER
    Obviously, "The Viking Warrior" will ultimatly be measured by his performance against Calzaghe. At this point, including him in the Top 10 is based more on talent and potential than accomplishment.
    Kessler is only 28, and he's the reigning titlist of two organisations. He's made four successful defences, and while there have been no creampuffs, the level of his title fight opposition hasn't been sterling. For instance, Markus Beyer was 35, and Eric Lukas, who hasn't fought since, had gone 2-2 in his previous four bouts.
    What makes Calzaghe-Kessler so appetising is not only the combined record of 82-0, but also the fact that they're so clearly the two best fighters in their division. Two European champions fighting for global dominance - just as it should be at super middleweight.
    www.boxingmonthly.com

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by WelshDevilRob View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by WelshDevilRob View Post
    The Poll was before Calzaghe vs Kessler and the writer was American Steve Farhood (who has written for KO and The Ring Magazine).

    Farhood said that if Joe beat Kessler then that would make him No.1.
    That would be for current super middle weights, this is all time.
    It was for all-time, Greg.

    I like Kessler a lot, but I don't think he has any claim for an all-time SMW champ. I can't get my head around the justification of that. I think maybe it was hype for the fight?
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1455
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    SuperMiddleweight has only been a division since 1984

    In modern times it has only been a division since 1984. I go back before that when it comes to watching fights.
    I don't follow
    There were no 168lbs fighters before 1984?
    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post

    In modern times it has only been a division since 1984. I go back before that when it comes to watching fights.
    I don't follow
    There were no 168lbs fighters before 1984?

    Fighters may have weighed 168 lbs. but they were not super middleweights. I understand your argument, but I don't believe it falls into the scope of the question and furthmore as you pointed out it reaches to times where would not have as much material to make a decision.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Down In The Valley
    Posts
    2,930
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1455
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post

    I don't follow
    There were no 168lbs fighters before 1984?

    Fighters may have weighed 168 lbs. but they were not super middleweights. I understand your argument, but I don't believe it falls into the scope of the question and furthmore as you pointed out it reaches to times where would not have as much material to make a decision.

    In fact it does fall into the scope of the question.. "All Time Best" I have been watching fights since before 1984, before they made a division called "Super Middleweight".

    168lbs is 168lbs, regardless of what label you place it on.

    If the question was: "Who is the greastest "Super Middleweight" since 1984, I would not have posted, but as that was not the question, it opens it up to debate as to who is the best "Super Middleweight" of all time, and last time I looked, 1901 was before 1984.
    Hidden Content Boot Hill, Where the Real Fights Are Fought.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ghost View Post

    There were no 168lbs fighters before 1984?

    Fighters may have weighed 168 lbs. but they were not super middleweights. I understand your argument, but I don't believe it falls into the scope of the question and furthmore as you pointed out it reaches to times where would not have as much material to make a decision.

    In fact it does fall into the scope of the question.. "All Time Best" I have been watching fights since before 1984, before they made a division called "Super Middleweight".

    168lbs is 168lbs, regardless of what label you place it on.

    If the question was: "Who is the greastest "Super Middleweight" since 1984, I would not have posted, but as that was not the question, it opens it up to debate as to who is the best "Super Middleweight" of all time, and last time I looked, 1901 was before 1984.
    So, to make this relevant give me an example.
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2582
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by tysonbruno View Post
    The top 10 of all time in the mag were

    1.Roy Jones
    2.Joe Calzaghe
    3.Nigel Benn
    4.Chris Eubank
    5.James Toney
    6.Steve Collins
    7.Sven Ottke
    8.Steve Liles
    9.Chong Pal Park
    10.Mikkel Kessler
    i put jones as one mainly because he fought a prime james toney who was in the top p4p 3 fighters in the world at the time. and calzaghes best fight was kessler who is a good fighter but is not well known and isnt considerd the top 10 best in the world

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Someone on these boards once argued that there was difference between being the best and being the greatest. Following that I'd say Roy Jones was the best Super Middleweight of all time - no one who has ever fought at 168 would have beaten a prime RJJ at the weight - while Calzaghe is the greatest (due to a better resume at the weight).
    That was probably me, I agree.

    The most accomplished super middleweight ever was Calzaghe without any real question imo. The best was Roy Jones Jr., match any super middleweight with a prime RJ then RJ wins no matter who the other guy beat.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    168
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Someone on these boards once argued that there was difference between being the best and being the greatest. Following that I'd say Roy Jones was the best Super Middleweight of all time - no one who has ever fought at 168 would have beaten a prime RJJ at the weight - while Calzaghe is the greatest (due to a better resume at the weight).
    That was probably me, I agree.

    The most accomplished super middleweight ever was Calzaghe without any real question imo. The best was Roy Jones Jr., match any super middleweight with a prime RJ then RJ wins no matter who the other guy beat.
    We'll have to agree to disagree then.

    For someone to simply say 'a prime roy jones could beat anyone' is ridiculous.

    Jones had 7 fights at supermiddleweight and this makes him the best ever? He didnt unify belts and isnt unbeaten...yet hes 'the best ever' for beating only one worthy challenger at that weight category and a load of bums...people need to start looking at the facts rather than bullsh1t.

    Calzaghe beats 5 worthy chllengers at that weight (kessler, lacy, reid, eubank and mitchell)...as well as about 5 x the amount of bums that roy jones fought at super middle and p1ssed all over them...yet he 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a prime roy jones'.

    Truly laughable.

    Jones was in his prime against the tricky southpaw fighter tarver...LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!

    So is it inconcievable to think that an even trickier, faster and more skilled southpaw fighter couldve beaten him?

    Ah...i forgot, hes roy jones, his unbelievable incredible record of beating toney, trinidad, hopkins and ruiz, makes him automatically the 'greatest ever'.

    The fact he lost to tarver and johnson is meaningless right?

    What makes me laugh so much on this forum is that people judge boxers on just 1 or 2 performances, TO JUDGE A BOXER AND EVALUATE HOW GOOD THEY ARE YOU MUST LOOK AT THEIR WHOLE CAREER IN BOXING.

    Not 1 or 2 performances.

    Calzaghe is far from his peak now, he was at his peak 3 years ago when he totally bashed lacy sh1tless...yet people think its totally inconcievable for the guy who completely schooled lacy (better than anyone jones fought at super middle except for toney) that calzaghe 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a peak roy jones'.

    Boxers peak for a fight and then decline, but the greatest boxer is the one with the greatest career.

    Is a prime buster douglas the greatest heavyweight of all time? NO HES NOT EVEN AN ATG! FAR FROM IT...but he beat a prime tyson...so according to these rules that people have, A PRIME TYSON IS NOT AS GOOD AS A PRIME BUSTER DOUGLAS!

    How does that make sense?

    Truly pathetic.

  11. #26
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    2,856
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1679
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by LondonBB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Someone on these boards once argued that there was difference between being the best and being the greatest. Following that I'd say Roy Jones was the best Super Middleweight of all time - no one who has ever fought at 168 would have beaten a prime RJJ at the weight - while Calzaghe is the greatest (due to a better resume at the weight).
    That was probably me, I agree.

    The most accomplished super middleweight ever was Calzaghe without any real question imo. The best was Roy Jones Jr., match any super middleweight with a prime RJ then RJ wins no matter who the other guy beat.
    We'll have to agree to disagree then.

    For someone to simply say 'a prime roy jones could beat anyone' is ridiculous.

    Jones had 7 fights at supermiddleweight and this makes him the best ever? He didnt unify belts and isnt unbeaten...yet hes 'the best ever' for beating only one worthy challenger at that weight category and a load of bums...people need to start looking at the facts rather than bullsh1t.

    Calzaghe beats 5 worthy chllengers at that weight (kessler, lacy, reid, eubank and mitchell)...as well as about 5 x the amount of bums that roy jones fought at super middle and p1ssed all over them...yet he 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a prime roy jones'.

    Truly laughable.

    Jones was in his prime against the tricky southpaw fighter tarver...LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!

    So is it inconcievable to think that an even trickier, faster and more skilled southpaw fighter couldve beaten him?

    Ah...i forgot, hes roy jones, his unbelievable incredible record of beating toney, trinidad, hopkins and ruiz, makes him automatically the 'greatest ever'.

    The fact he lost to tarver and johnson is meaningless right?

    What makes me laugh so much on this forum is that people judge boxers on just 1 or 2 performances, TO JUDGE A BOXER AND EVALUATE HOW GOOD THEY ARE YOU MUST LOOK AT THEIR WHOLE CAREER IN BOXING.

    Not 1 or 2 performances.

    Calzaghe is far from his peak now, he was at his peak 3 years ago when he totally bashed lacy sh1tless...yet people think its totally inconcievable for the guy who completely schooled lacy (better than anyone jones fought at super middle except for toney) that calzaghe 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a peak roy jones'.

    Boxers peak for a fight and then decline, but the greatest boxer is the one with the greatest career.

    Is a prime buster douglas the greatest heavyweight of all time? NO HES NOT EVEN AN ATG! FAR FROM IT...but he beat a prime tyson...so according to these rules that people have, A PRIME TYSON IS NOT AS GOOD AS A PRIME BUSTER DOUGLAS!

    How does that make sense?

    Truly pathetic.
    You are truly stupid. The RJJ that beat Toney was levels above Joe Calzaghe. Toney was ranked 2 P4P and Jones completely anihilated him. Yea Jones fough bums at 168 but he only lost 2 rounds in he 7 fights at that weight and knocked 5 guys out.

    Jones is the greatest ever fighter the 168 division has ever seen, but Calzaghe accomplished more there cos he stayed at 168 longer. I have no doubt if Jones had stayed at 168 for as long as Joe.
    Proof of that is he went up a division, fought bigger better fighters at 175 and owned that division for years.

    Joe is a great fighter, but to say he'd beat a mid 90's Jones is laughable.

  12. #27
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2472
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by tysonbruno View Post
    The top 10 of all time in the mag were

    1.Roy Jones
    2.Joe Calzaghe
    3.Nigel Benn
    4.Chris Eubank
    5.James Toney
    6.Steve Collins
    7.Sven Ottke
    8.Steve Liles
    9.Chong Pal Park
    10.Mikkel Kessler
    Do you mean Frank Liles or Steve Littles ?

  13. #28
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2811
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Super Middleweight, p4p, over it's history, will go down as the weakest division of all time.

  14. #29
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Quote Originally Posted by LondonBB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mikkel_K View Post
    Someone on these boards once argued that there was difference between being the best and being the greatest. Following that I'd say Roy Jones was the best Super Middleweight of all time - no one who has ever fought at 168 would have beaten a prime RJJ at the weight - while Calzaghe is the greatest (due to a better resume at the weight).
    That was probably me, I agree.

    The most accomplished super middleweight ever was Calzaghe without any real question imo. The best was Roy Jones Jr., match any super middleweight with a prime RJ then RJ wins no matter who the other guy beat.
    We'll have to agree to disagree then.

    For someone to simply say 'a prime roy jones could beat anyone' is ridiculous.

    Jones had 7 fights at supermiddleweight and this makes him the best ever? He didnt unify belts and isnt unbeaten...yet hes 'the best ever' for beating only one worthy challenger at that weight category and a load of bums...people need to start looking at the facts rather than bullsh1t.

    Calzaghe beats 5 worthy chllengers at that weight (kessler, lacy, reid, eubank and mitchell)...as well as about 5 x the amount of bums that roy jones fought at super middle and p1ssed all over them...yet he 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a prime roy jones'.

    Truly laughable.

    Jones was in his prime against the tricky southpaw fighter tarver...LOOK WHAT HAPPENED!

    So is it inconcievable to think that an even trickier, faster and more skilled southpaw fighter couldve beaten him?

    Ah...i forgot, hes roy jones, his unbelievable incredible record of beating toney, trinidad, hopkins and ruiz, makes him automatically the 'greatest ever'.

    The fact he lost to tarver and johnson is meaningless right?

    What makes me laugh so much on this forum is that people judge boxers on just 1 or 2 performances, TO JUDGE A BOXER AND EVALUATE HOW GOOD THEY ARE YOU MUST LOOK AT THEIR WHOLE CAREER IN BOXING.

    Not 1 or 2 performances.

    Calzaghe is far from his peak now, he was at his peak 3 years ago when he totally bashed lacy sh1tless...yet people think its totally inconcievable for the guy who completely schooled lacy (better than anyone jones fought at super middle except for toney) that calzaghe 'wouldnt even stand a chance against a peak roy jones'.

    Boxers peak for a fight and then decline, but the greatest boxer is the one with the greatest career.

    Is a prime buster douglas the greatest heavyweight of all time? NO HES NOT EVEN AN ATG! FAR FROM IT...but he beat a prime tyson...so according to these rules that people have, A PRIME TYSON IS NOT AS GOOD AS A PRIME BUSTER DOUGLAS!

    How does that make sense?

    Truly pathetic.

    You have to be kidding me here, you are absolutely ridiculous. Read the words of my post. ON PAPER, the GREATEST Super Middleweight ever by what he accomplished ON PAPER, is Joe Calzaghe. The BEST I believe is Roy Jones Jr. That's NOT because of what he did ON PAPER. It's because of how supremely talented he was AT 168 then anybody else has ever been, imo. So when you bring up him getting knocked out after he was already up to light heavyweight, skipped cruiser went up to heavyweight and then came down again to light heavyweight, that doesn't matter. Because I'm talking about when he was at 168. It doesn't matter who he beat, it's how he did it. JONES JR UD TONEY 12 doesn't mean anything it's how he looked doing it and that Roy Jones is the best ever I believe.

    The other shit, I don't know what you're on man but you lost me.

  15. #30
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5023
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Best Super Middleweight of all time to date?

    Who was the better of the two RJJ or Joe @ SMW?
    I'd have to side with RJJ.

    How do I rank them, well being that I personally rank RJJ as a LHW. I would rank Joe as #1.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 08-28-2007, 11:07 AM
  2. Top 50 Super Middleweight
    By Elephant Beer in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-28-2007, 12:48 PM
  3. Benn vs Eubank (Super-middleweight div)
    By Hughesd in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 05:14 PM
  4. Number 1 Super Middleweight right now!!
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 01-23-2007, 02:01 PM
  5. The Super middleweight top ten?
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-03-2006, 04:22 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing