I know you're one of the forum's biggest Oscar fans, just like I'm one of Tito's biggest fans. Granted, there are things to be admired about Oscar, such as how he did move through a few weight divisions successfully. However, I don't count middleweight in there. And while both Tito and Oscar were unsuccessful in their bids at MW, I personally give the higher grade to Tito at that weight. After all, Tito DID knockout William Joppy in impressive fashion. What did Oscar do at that weight that was convincing? Anyway, like I said before... Oscar HAS done a lot for boxing, and for that I (huge boxing fan that I've always been) am grateful. I guess my dislike for Oscar comes from three basic reasons:
1. His being a media darling from day one. Hell, you'd think his sh*t didn't stink. Once you get that stamp from the media, you can do no wrong.
2. The blatant way he puts his "legacy" before all else, even when it means he has clearly avoided certain fighters.
3. He just comes across FAKE to me. I don't know... call it a gut feeling. Oscar has always seemed like a used car salesman, always giving you a pitch.
People always compare Oscar favorably against Tito, and yet when you look at the bare numbers: Tito had the better record overall, the higher KO percentage. Several of Oscar's KO victories were against fighters that Tito had already ruined. Case in point, Vargas. Why did Oscar wait until Tito had pounded the crap out of Vargas to agree to face him? 'Cause a pre-Tito Vargas would've ripped him a new one, that's why. As for Tito quitting every time he lost... well, I can't say I was too happy about his quitting after the Hopkins fight. I blame his father for a lot of his bad decisions. But Tito was his own man and should've parted ways with his dad on boxing-related matters. But hey... Tito in his peak was unequaled, IMO.


Thanks:
Likes:
Dislikes: 


Reply With Quote

.
Bookmarks