How Do You Rank Jones, Calzaghe, and Hopkins ATGreatness As Of Now?

[match]

At what poit did i question the scoring of the calzage hopkins match?
I didnt i said hopkins came up with stupid excses which he did
What you said in your orignal post was guys like jones collect trinkets for titles and hopkins was the true middleweight champ

"The real middleweight champ was Hopkins. The real heavyweight champ was Lennox. All those guys did was pick up trinckets, not titles."

Well sorry no his titles were not trinkets they were genuine titles the only one i can agree with is the lennox lewis bit, to be the true champ you have to beat the champ not lose to him and then get his vacant title because he feels your not good enough to bother competing with anymore,hopkins was a champ but hardly the true champ
The implication above is jones did not beat lewis so he was not the real heavyweight champ fair enough, but to put hopkins in that bracket as well is stupid
Last it was clearly a prioroty for hopkins who ran his mouth off about fighting jones after he beat titto he called him out by name but when jones responded hopkins backed out because of money nothing to do with the fact RJJ said he was gonna move up a weight and b hop did not expect him to say yes LOL

Jones did THE EXACT same thing Hopkins did, hide behind money. EVERYONE thought Tito would beat Hopkins and EVERYONE was set for Trinidad-Jones at 168 the very next fight. At NO POINT DID ROY EVER bring up percentages when THAT was the plan. However, as soon as Hopkins won, now BOTH fighters start talking about what they will not accept. That is an indication that BOTH fighters would rather pursue other options. And I know you didn't question the scores, I'm saying when fighters lose split decisions they ALWAYS will say they should have won. And lastly, by your middleweight analogy, Lennox Lewis never became heavyweight champion, being that he never fought Riddick Bowe. I never said Roy won a trinket at middle or super middleweight or light heavy, I said heavyweight.

Fair enough i thought you were trying to diminish his achievements.I dont think roy hid behind money if someone beat me and i though i could win i would fight for free and 60 40 was a fair split considering hopkins had only one name on his record

I hear ya. The main thing is that everyone has different criteria for what they consider greatness. Some people believe it's the number of belts you win or how high you can go, some believe it's the level of competition or your record, others factor in if you've lost and if so, how close or lopsided. There's no right or wrong really, it's all subjective.

[mrodub]

To me it is the combo of most of the above and jones covers all the bases for me