Yes
Again, skill is a factor but so is heart and tenacity. Gatti was someone that gave everything when he was in the ring. If he had Roy Jones Jr's skill he would have been the greatest boxer of all time unlike Roy who had the skill but not necessarily the heart and tenacity.
I think those are some of the key points that can't be ignored when looking for an answer to this thread... By that I would say that yes he should be in...
Can you think of some recent heavyweight champs who have (statistically) 'career and achievement wise' equaled what Gatti achieved, but aren't worthy of Hall of Fame??
It brings light to the fact the hall of fame can't just be about statistical achievement, but also about bringing a quality to the sport that not many people have, and letting it hang out there in the best possible way.. And Gatti got to that 80% level of what can be achieved in boxing.. How many people get to that level and never make it to that A+ class, but leave us with as much as Gatti did? Pretty much no one...
He came through the ranks, and left us a legacy.. A legacy that may not have quite reached the top rungs, or achieved as much as some of those 1% fighters that do. But what he brought during the time the spotlight was on him, was up there with most boxers who have past and present been acknowledged as HOF material...
One of the problems is that the so-called experts who vote are too young to really remember some of the guys who deserve to get in. Also, they keep the process secretive so that the criteria remain unknown. If we knew what the standards were, we could make a better judgement on this. I know a number of people who are voters and believe me when I say this, many of the posters here and on other good sites know more about boxing and boxing history than the writers who vote. I no longer pay much attention to what they do there. I just enjoy going there and having a good time every June. But I do support the heck out of the Hall financially speaking. IT'S FOR A GOOD CAUSE AND IT PUTS MY MONEY WHERE MY MOUTH IS. That is all on this subject except to say that many of the posts have me reconsidering Gatti's worthiness.
I love Gatti the same way I love Bobby Chacon.
But I have to say neither one belongs in the hall.
However Barrys in and Nortons in so Gatti should be a fit.
Of course he is. There is no set criteria for the HOF, the simple fact that he managed to achieve the notoriety and following he did should be your answer. Besides that for what he lacked in skill he more than made up for with one of the biggest hearts of any fighter arguably ever. Hell Fransico Bojado and Derrick Gainer had more than enough skill to make it in themselves, should it not work both ways??
And Mike, don't forget, Bobby closed out his career with 7 straight wins agains very stiff opposition. He kept his legacy secure by doing that.![]()
I love Bobby dearly and I've shared a handful of great moments with him.
Nothing made him more happy then the day he was inducted himself into the Hall.
A man who left it all in the ring and fought every second of every single round of every fight.
It hurts me to say it Ted but it's the way I see it.
I'm actually gonna be seeing Bobby this weekend...
Hidden Content
"There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks