Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
No.

If Arturo Gatti is HOF worthy then Michael Katsidis must be.

No way Katsidis brought fans to the sport like Gatti did.

Point in fact, the Gatti - Ward trilogy is absolutely legendary in Boxing.
You can see what I'm saying Greg.

HOF is based on wins. Not excitement.

I don't necessarily agree here. Reason being is that Gatti brought something special to the sport, years from now people will know the heart Gatti had, and the afformentioned Gatti-Ward trilogy is actual boxing history, you cannot have a trilogy debate that doesn't include that. Years from now people on saddoboxing will remember Katsidis, but not many others. I don't agree that the HOF is based on wins at all. More so guys that did something special for the sport, and Gatti fits that bill.