Congrats to Paul Williams.

[ono]

I wouldn't have him in the top ten.

[Gandalf]

I wouldn't have him in the top ten.

Me neither. I think Williams is really good, but that first Quintana loss put him down. And a rematch win over a guy he should have beaten originally and then a fight at MW against who exactly. No, Williams is quality but needs a top win or two more to justify being in the top 10 P4P.

[ICB]

I wouldn't have him in the top ten.

Me either i still think fighters like.

Chad Dawson
Joe Calzaghe
Manny Pacquiao
Israel Vasquez
Bernard Hopkins
Rafael Marquez
Ivan Calderon
Juan Manuel Marquez
Vic Darchinyan
Antonio Margarito

Should easily be rated above Paul Williams, and im suprised Chad Dawson isn't in the top 10. Considering he's beaten good fighters like Eric Harding, Antonio Tarver, Tomasz Adamek, Glen Johnson.

[kingfrnk]

I wouldn't have him in the top ten.

Me either i still think fighters like.

Chad Dawson
Joe Calzaghe
Manny Pacquiao
Israel Vasquez
Bernard Hopkins
Rafael Marquez
Ivan Calderon
Juan Manuel Marquez
Vic Darchinyan
Antonio Margarito

Should easily be rated above Paul Williams, and im suprised Chad Dawson isn't in the top 10. Considering he's beaten good fighters like Eric Harding, Antonio Tarver, Tomasz Adamek, Glen Johnson.

all of those fighters u named are in the top 10 p4p list by ring mag. the only one on that list that should be #10 instead of paul is Chad Dawson because he has beating the better opposition. its not like hes in the top 5 or anything, hes in the very last place which he can easily be bumped from.

[leftylee]

Beating A. Margarito, Quintana in a 2nd attempt (After getting schooled the first time) and a shot Sharmba Mitchell doesn't make you P4P top ten worthy IMO.

[ICB]

Beating A. Margarito, Quintana in a 2nd attempt (After getting schooled the first time) and a shot Sharmba Mitchell doesn't make you P4P top ten worthy IMO.

I have your boy just outside the the top 10, and if he beats Paulie im not sure where i'll rank him, because even though he has had a much longer career than quite alot of fighters on the list.

Fighters like Chad Dawson have got a strong resume recently, so it just depends on how you look at it.

[leftylee]

Beating A. Margarito, Quintana in a 2nd attempt (After getting schooled the first time) and a shot Sharmba Mitchell doesn't make you P4P top ten worthy IMO.

I have your boy just outside the the top 10, and if he beats Paulie im not sure where i'll rank him, because even though he has had a much longer career than quite alot of fighters on the list.

Fighters like Chad Dawson have got a strong resume recently, so it just depends on how you look at it.

I have Hatton ahead of Paul Williams without doubt.

P4P wise I don't know. Maybe 10/11. I don't like P4P lists personally.

[leftylee]

Beating A. Margarito, Quintana in a 2nd attempt (After getting schooled the first time) and a shot Sharmba Mitchell doesn't make you P4P top ten worthy IMO.

I have your boy just outside the the top 10, and if he beats Paulie im not sure where i'll rank him, because even though he has had a much longer career than quite alot of fighters on the list.

Fighters like Chad Dawson have got a strong resume recently, so it just depends on how you look at it.

I do P4P on who they have beat in there career. Unlike yourself you do it how they look recently.

Works different ways, hence why I don't like them

[Rantcatrat]

P4p lists are subjective, but why is Miguel Cotto still in the Ring Magazine's top ten? In fact, Ring moved him this week from #9 position to #8. Please explain that to me. Cotto has stayed on the list after Margarito beat him.

Was Mijares a top ten p4p when Vic beat him?