Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 131

Thread: Beatles or Stones?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4169
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I think the Beatles were more diverse just in that they wern't just driven from within the blues then out into hard rock.
    The beatles could do a love song or a fun song or a rockin song or a heavy one with much different structures to the music than the stones do.

    Take for instance Michelle,compared to Helter skelter or Revolution.
    It isnt from the same music structure at all.
    The stones are great and rule but they do stick more to their set ways, as do Ac/Dc for instance, but them even more so.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    1
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Is this even a real question? I sincerely doubt the veracity that anyone even postulating what your 'friends' have are doing so for any other reason than to get a rise out of you. They are busting your Stones. If the Stones never existed, the world would be exactly as it is today. The Beatles? It would be a world unrecognizable to us, in a negative way. If they claim to be serious, have them take an IQ test - they probably won't even break double figures.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2473
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    its the stones
    i hate the beatles

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    its the stones
    i hate the beatles
    You're British and hate the Beatles? Off with his head!!!

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1752
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    beatles

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    4,485
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1752
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    oh forgor i know fk all abt music so dismiss me

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2583
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    i never understood the beatles at all but some how they damn near took over the world. even Rolling Stone has their Sgt Peppers Lonley Hearts Club Band as the best album of all time. And i actually downloaded it to see wat it sounded like and i dont understand it.

    Maybe i should listen to it some more.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    12,254
    Mentioned
    159 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2473
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Dark Lord Al View Post
    its the stones
    i hate the beatles
    You're British and hate the Beatles? Off with his head!!!
    My favorite is " IVE GOT YOU" by the Stones

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    Up in the attic
    Posts
    26,468
    Mentioned
    448 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4169
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    I have all the Stones old stuff on decca vinyl in mint condition all the basic blues stuff they started out with.
    I got about four other albums from over the years so probably got 11 in total.
    I have one or two Beatles albums.
    So even though I voted for Beatles in regards to the question and I stick by the reasons, I listen to the Stones more cause of my "taste in music" but that wasnt in the question.
    Hidden Content " border="0" />

    I can explain it.
    But I cant understand it for you.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by paulwalrus View Post
    Is this even a real question? I sincerely doubt the veracity that anyone even postulating what your 'friends' have are doing so for any other reason than to get a rise out of you. They are busting your Stones. If the Stones never existed, the world would be exactly as it is today. The Beatles? It would be a world unrecognizable to us, in a negative way. If they claim to be serious, have them take an IQ test - they probably won't even break double figures.
    The Walrus was Paul. Paul died about the time of Abbey Road. The bare feet prove it.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.
    Absolutely wrong Lyle
    The Beatles played folk,big band swing,spirituals,psychedelia,straight rock n roll,country and western,et all
    The Beatles used more and more complex instrumentation when noone else was.
    I like early Stones,but no way on earth were they more versatile
    Elanor Rigby
    Your Mother Should Know
    A Day In A Life
    Act Naturally
    Let It Be
    Norweigan wood
    vs
    Satisfaction
    Sympathy For The Devil
    Brown Sugar
    I wanna be your man(written by Lennon/McCartney)
    Lets Spend The Night Together
    The Last Time

    I like the Stones before Jones snuffed it,but it isnt even close,as far as versatility

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    982
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.
    Absolutely wrong Lyle
    The Beatles played folk,big band swing,spirituals,psychedelia,straight rock n roll,country and western,et all
    The Beatles used more and more complex instrumentation when noone else was.
    I like early Stones,but no way on earth were they more versatile
    Elanor Rigby
    Your Mother Should Know
    A Day In A Life
    Act Naturally
    Let It Be
    Norweigan wood
    vs
    Satisfaction
    Sympathy For The Devil
    Brown Sugar
    I wanna be your man(written by Lennon/McCartney)
    Lets Spend The Night Together
    The Last Time

    I like the Stones before Jones snuffed it,but it isnt even close,as far as versatility
    Thank you. You are 100% right.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2812
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
    The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.
    Absolutely wrong Lyle
    The Beatles played folk,big band swing,spirituals,psychedelia,straight rock n roll,country and western,et all
    The Beatles used more and more complex instrumentation when noone else was.
    I like early Stones,but no way on earth were they more versatile
    Elanor Rigby
    Your Mother Should Know
    A Day In A Life
    Act Naturally
    Let It Be
    Norweigan wood
    vs
    Satisfaction
    Sympathy For The Devil
    Brown Sugar
    I wanna be your man(written by Lennon/McCartney)
    Lets Spend The Night Together
    The Last Time

    I like the Stones before Jones snuffed it,but it isnt even close,as far as versatility
    Thank you. You are 100% right.
    enlighten me. When did the Beatles do Country and Western? And did they ever do a straight ahead twelve bar blues?

    They weren't too far behind with the insrumentation and psychedelia (Their Satanic Majesties Request ), they just didn't stick with it.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Beatles or Stones?

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    Absolutely wrong Lyle
    The Beatles played folk,big band swing,spirituals,psychedelia,straight rock n roll,country and western,et all
    The Beatles used more and more complex instrumentation when noone else was.
    I like early Stones,but no way on earth were they more versatile
    Elanor Rigby
    Your Mother Should Know
    A Day In A Life
    Act Naturally
    Let It Be
    Norweigan wood
    vs
    Satisfaction
    Sympathy For The Devil
    Brown Sugar
    I wanna be your man(written by Lennon/McCartney)
    Lets Spend The Night Together
    The Last Time

    I like the Stones before Jones snuffed it,but it isnt even close,as far as versatility
    Thank you. You are 100% right.
    enlighten me. When did the Beatles do Country and Western? And did they ever do a straight ahead twelve bar blues?

    They weren't too far behind with the insrumentation and psychedelia (Their Satanic Majesties Request ), they just didn't stick with it.
    Act Naturally was a straight C&W song that became a C&W hit by a different artist

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tonsil Stones (kinda gross)
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 12:17 PM
  2. BEATLES FANS - CHECK DIS OUT!!!
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-03-2008, 04:44 AM
  3. Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-21-2007, 10:14 PM
  4. Beatles..Yellow Submarine-full film here
    By smashup in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 02-15-2007, 09:34 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing