The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.
The Stones were waaaaaay more versitlie as a band, The Beatles were great but only branched out near the end and then as individual acts.
I think the Beatles were more diverse just in that they wern't just driven from within the blues then out into hard rock.
The beatles could do a love song or a fun song or a rockin song or a heavy one with much different structures to the music than the stones do.
Take for instance Michelle,compared to Helter skelter or Revolution.
It isnt from the same music structure at all.
The stones are great and rule but they do stick more to their set ways, as do Ac/Dc for instance, but them even more so.
Is this even a real question? I sincerely doubt the veracity that anyone even postulating what your 'friends' have are doing so for any other reason than to get a rise out of you. They are busting your Stones. If the Stones never existed, the world would be exactly as it is today. The Beatles? It would be a world unrecognizable to us, in a negative way. If they claim to be serious, have them take an IQ test - they probably won't even break double figures.
its the stones
i hate the beatles
beatles
oh forgor i know fk all abt music so dismiss me
i never understood the beatles at all but some how they damn near took over the world. even Rolling Stone has their Sgt Peppers Lonley Hearts Club Band as the best album of all time. And i actually downloaded it to see wat it sounded like and i dont understand it.
Maybe i should listen to it some more.
I have all the Stones old stuff on decca vinyl in mint condition all the basic blues stuff they started out with.
I got about four other albums from over the years so probably got 11 in total.
I have one or two Beatles albums.
So even though I voted for Beatles in regards to the question and I stick by the reasons, I listen to the Stones more cause of my "taste in music" but that wasnt in the question.
Absolutely wrong Lyle
The Beatles played folk,big band swing,spirituals,psychedelia,straight rock n roll,country and western,et all
The Beatles used more and more complex instrumentation when noone else was.
I like early Stones,but no way on earth were they more versatile
Elanor Rigby
Your Mother Should Know
A Day In A Life
Act Naturally
Let It Be
Norweigan wood
vs
Satisfaction
Sympathy For The Devil
Brown Sugar
I wanna be your man(written by Lennon/McCartney)
Lets Spend The Night Together
The Last Time
I like the Stones before Jones snuffed it,but it isnt even close,as far as versatility
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks