I think Cotto broke his fukken jaw.
I think Cotto broke his fukken jaw.
I don't know i didn't start the thread.
There's no point you winking like you know something we don't. Everybody knows Cotto would be too much for Hatton at 147. He's naturally bigger and stronger....and technically a better fighter.
If they had have met in the past it would likely be at 140 where Cotto wasn't as strong. Cotto would have had a lot of problems imo.
I just find it strange that anybody can say Cotto did a better job on Paulie considering he gave away 4 or 5 rounds to a guy who broke his hand. It's the sport of Boxing. Rounds win you fights. If we we're judging street fights then i'd be inclined to say Cotto did a terrific job, but he got hit far too frequently (and stunned) for me to say he did a better job than a guy who hardly got hit and totally dominated every aspect of the fight.
Not knocking Cotto....i love watching him. Just don't think he was as effective at 140 as Hatton has been. 147 = different story.
Clearly Hatton. If Paulie bothered to stand up and actually take part in the fight it would have been over by rd 5.
EXACTLY!
We also have to consider that Cotto broke his hand in the fifth round so basicly Paulie was defending himself against a one armed man from rounds 5 1/2 to 12. What is really shocking is that Hatton's faces was all bruisedHow can you suffer lumps and bruises from a guy who hits like a girl? I did not see anything new from Hatton other than patience but Paulie was taking a play out of the Mayweather Jr. play book and ducking and grabbing Hatton by the head like Floyd did. Paulie is Cotto's damaged goods. Pualie has never been the same since then. If Malignaggi and Hatton are the best of the 140 lb division, I think this division is weak as phuk.
I thought the fight was pretty boring but it was not Hatton's fault of course because it was Paulie who was doing most of the hit and hold but Hatton likes to do a little of that himself but I dont consider his style hit and hold it's more like hit, hold, hit, hold and maul your opponent which is different from what Paulie has to do since he is not considered an inside fighter.
So who beat Paulie down worse? Cotto had this kid beaten like a pulp in under 5 rounds and the only thing that saved Paulie was the fact that Cotto broke his hand. End of.
Last edited by SigmaMu; 11-23-2008 at 10:09 PM.
I find it comical that people say Paulie was finished goods after Cotto.
NOBODY said this beforehand.
Also you may wanna check out his first fight with Lovermore N'Dou.
I can't believe Cotto conceded 5 rounds to this puff![]()
Remember that Cotto broke his hand in the fifth.
Hatton never stopped Malignaggi, it was Paulies corner who stopped it. Paulie is known for being tough and his corner even took that away from him. I believe that Cotto would have knocked Pualie out had he not broken his hand. I guess we will just have to see what Hatton still has and has learned when he gets in the ring with someone better than Malignaggi who IMO sucks and after he got served by Cotto, he has never been the same but if Paulie is the best that weight division has then it is a very lousy division.
Maybe Cotto did take a lot out of Paulie that's possible, but Paulie has never been that good. I don't remember Paulie winning five rounds either. I would say four was a bit of a stretch but it has been awhile. And Cotto looked horrible at the weigh in, as drained as anybody I've ever seen.
Basically Cotto did more damage partly cause Paulie was more willing to fight and Hatton won more rounds. Not that it really matters unless you're a huge fan of either guy.
You can't use the argument "Cotto finished Paulie" because Paulies best performance/win came AFTER Cotto.
It's simply a case of - Paulie's not that good.
Cotto can have the excuse of being undermotivated for such a NON-dangerous puncher, as well as the OBVIOUS weight troubles he had. Cotto still smashed him.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks