Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 121

Thread: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1149
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
    I dont think anyone is saying he would have beaten Mayweather,but he would have had a much better shot if he had been tighter and in better shape is more what both of us are saying.
    I still think Floyd would end up being too slick for Hatton's style,but he would have had a better shot at it lighter
    Spot on Bro .. simple as that
    So you are saying he would have won more rounds? Or maybe see the final bell? Or maybe he had more of a punchers chance? If you are not saying he would win, then maybe I missed the original point of this topic as written by beanflicker:

    Quote Originally Posted by beanflicker
    Apart from Joe Cortez, the biggest excuse for his loss was the weight they fought at. Both guys are the same height, Ricky started his career (and stayed) at 140, Floyd starts his career at 130. Ricky is known as the bigger fighter, a guy who balloons up between fights and kills himself to make weight.

    So how would the fight have been any different if both men had to weight in at 140? People say Ricky isn't a WW. True, but neither is Mayweather. Mayweather is just a guy fighting in weight classes he has no business in because he's going where the money is.

    So how would have 140 made the fight different? You'd think weighting at 147 would benefit Ricky more, because he's the guy who kills himself making weight. Would extra hours spent in the sauna cutting weight make Ricky better? Would making 140 be to PBF's detriment? Why? He's in shape 24/7, 365 and never has an issue making weight.
    Well said bro thats all I was saying is that he fights his best fight at lite welter ..who ever its against...not saying he would win at all thats open to everyones opinion...but more chance of giving a better account at lite welter...

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    On the levee
    Posts
    47,078
    Mentioned
    438 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5123
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    140,147.....The fact that Hatton drinks like a fish in the off time and melts back down to fit shape by fight time is pretty amazing and one would think pretty taxing physically.Whatever the weight,Hatton could not compensate for the athleticism of Mayweather.Hattons 'fast' is Mayweathers 'lightspeed'.............And I picked Hatton

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 09:18 AM
  2. WHY IS WEIGHT NO LONGER AN ISSUE AT 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 05:53 PM
  3. Why is weight no longer an issue after 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 02:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing