Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 121

Thread: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Posts
    332
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1130
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Here goes.

    Ricky Hatton is a natural 140 pound fighter, always has been and always will be.

    At 147 he is limited, his strength, power, speed. He isn't the same fighter WHATSOEVER.

    Floyd Mayweather started at what ? 130 pounds ? Whatever. He (Like Manny Pacquiao, David Haye etc) are able to move up divisions and still retain the speed, power etc while maybe adding more to the game.

    Mayweather fought a number of times previousley at 147 and even was competitive at 150. There was no indication whatsoever he stuggled at the weight.

    Hatton on the other hand did. He fought Luis Collazo in 2006 and won a decision only by a couple of points. He looked lackluster, it weren't the Ricky Hatton we had seen previousley.

    In contrast when he cams back down to 140 in his next fight he destorys Jose Luis Castillo (Shot ot not, had never been knocked out before) in the 4t round of there fight and looks exceptional in doing so.

    THIS FIGHT WITH CASTILLO WAS AN INDICATION 140 POUNDS IS WHERE HE BELONGS.

    He says he's a natural 140 pounder and so does his trainer.

    Then all of a sudden he agrees to fight Mayweather, stating the chance to become P4P number 1 is too hard to resist. The bout is at welterweight, which suits PBF. Hatton again looks poor with the added 5 pounds.

    My point is Ricky Hatton can only be "Ricky Hatton" at 140 pounds and nowhere else. When Ricky fights at welterweight he in totally ineffective and cannot bully opponents like he does at 140.

    Unlike Floyd Mayweather who can jump through several divisions and can still bully opponenets, Ricky can't.

    A fight at 140 would be totally different.

    Hatton would be comfortable (The weight loss is not a problem) and would be able to bully Mayweather.

    Would he win ? Totally honest: probbably not but I can GUARANTEE he would be much better than he was at 145 pounds.

    I read through this and agreed with everything until you said "A fight at 140 would be totally different."

    After watching Floyd Hatton it finally made me appreciate Floyd Mayweather as a fighter, his ability it to be able to read another fighters style and adapt his to suit this is what he did with Hatton.

    I am a Big Hatton fan but there is no shame in getting beat by PBF he may be one of the greatest fighters to ever put on gloves

    Floyd Beats Hatton at any weight in the same way
    "There is no point being alive if you cannot do the deadlift."
    John Paul Sigmarrsson, 4 time Word's Strongest Man

    Hidden Content

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1148
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by sonny78 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Here goes.

    Ricky Hatton is a natural 140 pound fighter, always has been and always will be.

    At 147 he is limited, his strength, power, speed. He isn't the same fighter WHATSOEVER.

    Floyd Mayweather started at what ? 130 pounds ? Whatever. He (Like Manny Pacquiao, David Haye etc) are able to move up divisions and still retain the speed, power etc while maybe adding more to the game.

    Mayweather fought a number of times previousley at 147 and even was competitive at 150. There was no indication whatsoever he stuggled at the weight.

    Hatton on the other hand did. He fought Luis Collazo in 2006 and won a decision only by a couple of points. He looked lackluster, it weren't the Ricky Hatton we had seen previousley.

    In contrast when he cams back down to 140 in his next fight he destorys Jose Luis Castillo (Shot ot not, had never been knocked out before) in the 4t round of there fight and looks exceptional in doing so.

    THIS FIGHT WITH CASTILLO WAS AN INDICATION 140 POUNDS IS WHERE HE BELONGS.

    He says he's a natural 140 pounder and so does his trainer.

    Then all of a sudden he agrees to fight Mayweather, stating the chance to become P4P number 1 is too hard to resist. The bout is at welterweight, which suits PBF. Hatton again looks poor with the added 5 pounds.

    My point is Ricky Hatton can only be "Ricky Hatton" at 140 pounds and nowhere else. When Ricky fights at welterweight he in totally ineffective and cannot bully opponents like he does at 140.

    Unlike Floyd Mayweather who can jump through several divisions and can still bully opponenets, Ricky can't.

    A fight at 140 would be totally different.

    Hatton would be comfortable (The weight loss is not a problem) and would be able to bully Mayweather.

    Would he win ? Totally honest: probbably not but I can GUARANTEE he would be much better than he was at 145 pounds.

    I read through this and agreed with everything until you said "A fight at 140 would be totally different."

    After watching Floyd Hatton it finally made me appreciate Floyd Mayweather as a fighter, his ability it to be able to read another fighters style and adapt his to suit this is what he did with Hatton.

    I am a Big Hatton fan but there is no shame in getting beat by PBF he may be one of the greatest fighters to ever put on gloves

    Floyd Beats Hatton at any weight in the same way
    But then bud re your response we are getting into peoples opinions .. ya said ya self that you agree with all said except the result or should I say fight at 140 would be the same...

    Im not saying the out come would be any different but seeing a far better effort from Hatton is what some think ..,.. & what some dont think too.... opinions .... no more no less

    I also love both fighters & think Floyd is the greatest fighter of his generation....a very special commodity indeed..


    Last edited by bambamdaddio; 11-28-2008 at 11:15 AM.
    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Liverpool, UK
    Posts
    6,157
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by sonny78 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Here goes.

    Ricky Hatton is a natural 140 pound fighter, always has been and always will be.

    At 147 he is limited, his strength, power, speed. He isn't the same fighter WHATSOEVER.

    Floyd Mayweather started at what ? 130 pounds ? Whatever. He (Like Manny Pacquiao, David Haye etc) are able to move up divisions and still retain the speed, power etc while maybe adding more to the game.

    Mayweather fought a number of times previousley at 147 and even was competitive at 150. There was no indication whatsoever he stuggled at the weight.

    Hatton on the other hand did. He fought Luis Collazo in 2006 and won a decision only by a couple of points. He looked lackluster, it weren't the Ricky Hatton we had seen previousley.

    In contrast when he cams back down to 140 in his next fight he destorys Jose Luis Castillo (Shot ot not, had never been knocked out before) in the 4t round of there fight and looks exceptional in doing so.

    THIS FIGHT WITH CASTILLO WAS AN INDICATION 140 POUNDS IS WHERE HE BELONGS.

    He says he's a natural 140 pounder and so does his trainer.

    Then all of a sudden he agrees to fight Mayweather, stating the chance to become P4P number 1 is too hard to resist. The bout is at welterweight, which suits PBF. Hatton again looks poor with the added 5 pounds.

    My point is Ricky Hatton can only be "Ricky Hatton" at 140 pounds and nowhere else. When Ricky fights at welterweight he in totally ineffective and cannot bully opponents like he does at 140.

    Unlike Floyd Mayweather who can jump through several divisions and can still bully opponenets, Ricky can't.

    A fight at 140 would be totally different.

    Hatton would be comfortable (The weight loss is not a problem) and would be able to bully Mayweather.

    Would he win ? Totally honest: probbably not but I can GUARANTEE he would be much better than he was at 145 pounds.

    I read through this and agreed with everything until you said "A fight at 140 would be totally different."

    After watching Floyd Hatton it finally made me appreciate Floyd Mayweather as a fighter, his ability it to be able to read another fighters style and adapt his to suit this is what he did with Hatton.

    I am a Big Hatton fan but there is no shame in getting beat by PBF he may be one of the greatest fighters to ever put on gloves

    Floyd Beats Hatton at any weight in the same way
    How is it not hard to understand at fight at 140 would be different ?

    Of course it would be different. It's a different weight class and it suits Hatton better whearas 147 suited Mayweather better.

    Mayweather has not fought at 140 in years, Hatton at 140 is deadly.

    It would be a whole different ball game.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Im just about the biggest hatton fan going and even i dont buy this absurd theory that 7pounds makes a world of difference or even a major one.

    Hatton got beat by mayweather because floyd was simply the better fighter and ricky being ricky went for all knowing he had to KO his man and got caught.

    Collazo was simply an off night and a massive learning curve for ricky.
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1148
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Im just about the biggest hatton fan going and even i dont buy this absurd theory that 7pounds makes a world of difference or even a major one.

    Hatton got beat by mayweather because floyd was simply the better fighter and ricky being ricky went for all knowing he had to KO his man and got caught.

    Collazo was simply an off night and a massive learning curve for ricky.
    Mate if your saying a fighter coming down from lite mid to welter (ODLH fight) to fight a lite welter moving up to welter, even tho he has consistently through out his career shown to be a better fighter at lite welter (Hatton) ...& even admitting after the Collazo fight that with Collazo's shots he felt the extra weight difference .... then thats even more obsurd ...

    & do you really believe Ricky fought Floyd in the belief he would walk through him & go for the legacy ? ..... personally I dont ....

    No ... it was all about money & a shot in the dark re the legacy .... more hoping than believing...& yes he was soundly beaten, & maybe he still would be at 140,

    I almost find it insults Hatton by claiming him to be the same fighter at 147 that he is at 140 because he isnt...

    He is a shodow of the 140 fighter when fighting 147...


    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    3,785
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2169
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Im just about the biggest hatton fan going and even i dont buy this absurd theory that 7pounds makes a world of difference or even a major one.

    Hatton got beat by mayweather because floyd was simply the better fighter and ricky being ricky went for all knowing he had to KO his man and got caught.

    Collazo was simply an off night and a massive learning curve for ricky.
    Mate if your saying a fighter coming down from lite mid to welter (ODLH fight) to fight a lite welter moving up to welter, even tho he has consistently through out his career shown to be a better fighter at lite welter (Hatton) ...& even admitting after the Collazo fight that with Collazo's shots he felt the extra weight difference .... then thats even more obsurd ...

    & do you really believe Ricky fought Floyd in the belief he would walk through him & go for the legacy ? ..... personally I dont ....

    No ... it was all about money & a shot in the dark re the legacy .... more hoping than believing...& yes he was soundly beaten, & maybe he still would be at 140,

    I almost find it insults Hatton by claiming him to be the same fighter at 147 that he is at 140 because he isnt...

    He is a shodow of the 140 fighter when fighting 147...


    You know i'm with ya on everything you just said... Whether both fighters meeting up at 140 OR 147 would make any difference to the course of the fight or the outcome, is a question for philosophy... It may well make no difference at all....

    But it my mind it is 100% certain that either mentally, or physically, or both, P4P, Ricky brings more into the ring at 140 than at 147.. I can't see it any other way in regards to that one fact..

    But no day of the week I would say that Hatton moving up to 147 effected the end result of his fight against Floyd.. Just the percentage of potential he brought into the ring was affected... It's almost boxing fact & legend at the same time.. Every time a fighter changes weight up and down, we talk about it's effects vs the opponent who is doing the same, or fighting at their dominant weight.....
    ~ He thinks he's a Tornado,,,... F'ckn real Tornado is comin'...! ~Hidden Content

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1148
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by Dizaster View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bambamdaddio View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
    Im just about the biggest hatton fan going and even i dont buy this absurd theory that 7pounds makes a world of difference or even a major one.

    Hatton got beat by mayweather because floyd was simply the better fighter and ricky being ricky went for all knowing he had to KO his man and got caught.

    Collazo was simply an off night and a massive learning curve for ricky.
    Mate if your saying a fighter coming down from lite mid to welter (ODLH fight) to fight a lite welter moving up to welter, even tho he has consistently through out his career shown to be a better fighter at lite welter (Hatton) ...& even admitting after the Collazo fight that with Collazo's shots he felt the extra weight difference .... then thats even more obsurd ...

    & do you really believe Ricky fought Floyd in the belief he would walk through him & go for the legacy ? ..... personally I dont ....

    No ... it was all about money & a shot in the dark re the legacy .... more hoping than believing...& yes he was soundly beaten, & maybe he still would be at 140,

    I almost find it insults Hatton by claiming him to be the same fighter at 147 that he is at 140 because he isnt...

    He is a shodow of the 140 fighter when fighting 147...


    You know i'm with ya on everything you just said... Whether both fighters meeting up at 140 OR 147 would make any difference to the course of the fight or the outcome, is a question for philosophy... It may well make no difference at all....

    But it my mind it is 100% certain that either mentally, or physically, or both, P4P, Ricky brings more into the ring at 140 than at 147.. I can't see it any other way in regards to that one fact..

    But no day of the week I would say that Hatton moving up to 147 effected the end result of his fight against Floyd.. Just the percentage of potential he brought into the ring was affected... It's almost boxing fact & legend at the same time.. Every time a fighter changes weight up and down, we talk about it's effects vs the opponent who is doing the same, or fighting at their dominant weight.....
    You got it bud ... well said too..

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    LEEDS
    Posts
    467
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1148
    Cool Clicks

    Talking Re: Someone explain this to me (Floyd/Hatton weight issue)

    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by sonny78 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by leftylee View Post
    Here goes.

    Ricky Hatton is a natural 140 pound fighter, always has been and always will be.

    At 147 he is limited, his strength, power, speed. He isn't the same fighter WHATSOEVER.

    Floyd Mayweather started at what ? 130 pounds ? Whatever. He (Like Manny Pacquiao, David Haye etc) are able to move up divisions and still retain the speed, power etc while maybe adding more to the game.

    Mayweather fought a number of times previousley at 147 and even was competitive at 150. There was no indication whatsoever he stuggled at the weight.

    Hatton on the other hand did. He fought Luis Collazo in 2006 and won a decision only by a couple of points. He looked lackluster, it weren't the Ricky Hatton we had seen previousley.

    In contrast when he cams back down to 140 in his next fight he destorys Jose Luis Castillo (Shot ot not, had never been knocked out before) in the 4t round of there fight and looks exceptional in doing so.

    THIS FIGHT WITH CASTILLO WAS AN INDICATION 140 POUNDS IS WHERE HE BELONGS.

    He says he's a natural 140 pounder and so does his trainer.

    Then all of a sudden he agrees to fight Mayweather, stating the chance to become P4P number 1 is too hard to resist. The bout is at welterweight, which suits PBF. Hatton again looks poor with the added 5 pounds.

    My point is Ricky Hatton can only be "Ricky Hatton" at 140 pounds and nowhere else. When Ricky fights at welterweight he in totally ineffective and cannot bully opponents like he does at 140.

    Unlike Floyd Mayweather who can jump through several divisions and can still bully opponenets, Ricky can't.

    A fight at 140 would be totally different.

    Hatton would be comfortable (The weight loss is not a problem) and would be able to bully Mayweather.

    Would he win ? Totally honest: probbably not but I can GUARANTEE he would be much better than he was at 145 pounds.

    I read through this and agreed with everything until you said "A fight at 140 would be totally different."

    After watching Floyd Hatton it finally made me appreciate Floyd Mayweather as a fighter, his ability it to be able to read another fighters style and adapt his to suit this is what he did with Hatton.

    I am a Big Hatton fan but there is no shame in getting beat by PBF he may be one of the greatest fighters to ever put on gloves

    Floyd Beats Hatton at any weight in the same way
    How is it not hard to understand at fight at 140 would be different ?

    Of course it would be different. It's a different weight class and it suits Hatton better whearas 147 suited Mayweather better.

    Mayweather has not fought at 140 in years, Hatton at 140 is deadly.

    It would be a whole different ball game.
    Well said bud & I fully support & understand the points your making ... its simple enough to me..

    Hidden Content
    A lot of boxing promoters couldn't match the cheeks of their buttocks. Mickey Duff..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 05-05-2008, 09:18 AM
  2. WHY IS WEIGHT NO LONGER AN ISSUE AT 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 05:53 PM
  3. Why is weight no longer an issue after 200lbs?
    By shalamigri in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-21-2005, 02:42 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing