Beatles or Stones?

[mrbig1]

Here's a point of comparison... When's the last time you heard a Stones tune in a department store or a doctor's office, or an elevator for that matter?

For the Stones, hiring Ron Wood was a step in the wrong direction IMO. It would have been better if they had found themselves a real good lead guitarist, which Wood ain't.

I was sitting in the doctors waiting room and a Beatles song came on. Their music was so beautiful. 50 years from now the Beatles songs will still mean something. People will still get it. The Rolling stones of 1964 are the same in 2008. The Beatles of 1964 were not the same in 1966. Thank you Marijuana.

[Youngblood]

http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=RaNQjhXhfVs

[CGM]

Here's a point of comparison... When's the last time you heard a Stones tune in a department store or a doctor's office, or an elevator for that matter?

For the Stones, hiring Ron Wood was a step in the wrong direction IMO. It would have been better if they had found themselves a real good lead guitarist, which Wood ain't.

I was sitting in the doctors waiting room and a Beatles song came on. Their music was so beautiful. 50 years from now the Beatles songs will still mean something. People will still get it. The Rolling stones of 1964 are the same in 2008. The Beatles of 1964 were not the same in 1966. Thank you Marijuana.

No. Thank you Bob.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ybI34Z_ZHbo

[wesrman]

The Beatles of 1964 were not the same in 1966. Thank you LSD.

FYP.

[mrbig1]

Rubber soul was their first album while on weed. The LSD thing came later. I'm not saying the weed is good or bad but they did become better song writers.

[CGM]

Some interesting stuff here on the influence Dylan had on Lennon's songwriting

http://www.beatlesbible.com/songs/yo...our-love-away/

[mrbig1]

learn something new everyday.