I consider a fighter a prospect depending on their potential, I think until JML fights either Marquez or Vazquez that he is a prospect.
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
I consider a fighter a prospect depending on their potential, I think until JML fights either Marquez or Vazquez that he is a prospect.
Array
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Array
Ortiz is the one I'm most exited about from those.
Array
No it isn't, they have never had JML's potential which is what I am saying, I think Roy Jones JR was a prospect until he faced James Toney ,and the world realized how good he was, even though he was already a title holder at middleweight, and had beaten respectable names.
I think Ali was a prospect until he faced Listion though he had already foughten good fighters before then
Mayweather was largely considered a prospect until he beat Corrales, even though it was his seventh title defense.
I still view Berto has a prosecpt even though he has a title, because he hasn't foughten the best yet.
LIke I said I think a guy is a prospect until he faces somebody who is considered at least even with him going into the fight.
Array
Not trying to argue, but how did we know how Molitor would do against Caballero until they fought?
How would we know how ALi would do against Liston? Or Roy vs Toney?
I feel that until these guys fight the best in the world at their division there is always doubt about how good they will be when they take that step up.
Array
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Thats close to it, I respect your opinion of it, I guess its hard to say, Personally I still think Dawson is a little bit of a prospect, I think a guy with a certain amount of ability needs to have that defining fight, I mean Hopkins, we didn't really know how to cage his skills until he fought Trinidad at 36, so it gets tricky, but I consider a prospect a guy who we still have questions about what he can become, as opposed to guys who we feel we have a pretty good indication of what skill level they have, how good they can possibly get, so to contradict what I've said before I think a prospect is a guy who hasnt' peaked yet. I think a guy like JML should be in the top 10 p4p eventually, and when that happens he will have stopped being a prospect. I still think Cotto was a prospect/belt holder until he fought Judah, because despite the Quintana fight, we saw his weaknesses as well, and thats when I knew for sure that he was going to be able to hang with the big boys. For Mayweather it was Corrales, Pavlik it was Taylor, Taylor it was Hopkins, Kessler it was the way IMO that he beat Mundine in the second half of that fight. Vazquez it was beating Marquez in the rematch. Pacquiao it was beating Barrera.
Some guys don't have the potential so I feel they reach their mark faster, but some guys have all the potential in the world, and I think that they need the right opponent to bring it out of them, or the right opponent to show, "look I can compete or beat anyone in the world."
hey there boxin on here
Array
Wow, I can be wonderfully redundant and wrong...
Array
To answer the question I think it's JML because I think only JML has showed he has what it takes to be great as in the best fighter in boxing great, I think it's pretty hard to bet against him against anyone and he will be THE guy in the not to distant future. Really excited to see him I think there are a lot of guys coming up.
I can understand how JML can still be considered a prospect just based on what he's done versus what he is expecting to hopes to do. Certainly he has bigger fish to fry then Ponce De Leon or any of these guys he's beat, he still hasn't actually been tested in the ring yet with anyone close to his skill level. So I can understand how one could call him a prospect, I think it's OK either way.
Also what the hell is Hattonthehammer on about? Does he post here anymore I mean really, really? Wrong on about 10 trillion levels. I really don't want this to turn into a UK Fans versus US Fans thread but I have to get this in, if Andre Ward, Andre Berto, Andre Dirrell or the Peterson brothers got KO'd in the 1st round by a wild swinging Colombian, you couldn't get anyone here to say one good word about a win over Oisin Fagan. I think Khan is almost being given a break now that he's coming back simply because it's like an easy target. He's getting treated very well imo while Kirkland and Gamboa, guys who should be creating tremendous buzz simply because they are fun to watch fight, like Khan but at a higher level, aren't.
Last edited by amat; 01-02-2009 at 05:50 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks