Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
Was he physically capable? sure why not? It's remarkable what a little antiinflammatory will do, add to that a good shot of adrenaline and a little booze to fuel the rage. Anyone capable of routinely playing a round of golf I'd say is probably capable of slashing someone's throat. The guy probably still had a lot of strength.

Was there reasonable doubt. I guess the criminal jury thought so, if not the civil jury. Obviously you have more confidence in the criminal jury, such as it was, than I do.
I have confidence in the letter of the law.
And as far as being able to play a round of golf,look at any golf course,they have corpses propped up out there. I dont think they can wipe out a bodybuilder and an ex wife in a lit front yard with nobody noticing.
Letter of the Law. Don't gimme that crap. You think mistakes aren't made? You think juries are perfect? You think a jury has never mistakenly convicted an innocent? Or freed a guilty? You think there has never been a jury that was motivated by race? Christ almighty, you just finished saying of the general public that they seemed to be very motivated by race. Gimme a break.
The letter of the law in the United States is beyond a reasonable doubt,and innocent until proven guilty
There was reasonable doubt
And he wasnt proven guilty.
In hindsight the prosecutions case was thinner then Lindsay Lohan.
They dont have a single witness placing him at the scene,and all of their forensic evidence is tainted by improper handling.
What the hell can you use to convict him,"We really think he might have done it"?
Well there's a legal precedent that its a good idea to set.
"He looks guilty,grab him and a rope"