It's not all cut and dry like that though, obviously. There's to much grey area to simply rank the elements in order imo. For instance if one guy is landing the cleaner, more effective punches, yet the other guy is always pressing forward and forcing his man to fight off the back foot in this manner, while being visibly stronger or fresher, who is the ring general? Is it the first guy, because clean effective punching is more important than effective agressiveness? Because it's certainly not a given one fighter will be doing both. And to what extent does having a tight defence negate the agressor's edge.. If a guy barely get's hit in a round, yet spends the whole time backing away from his opponent and only lands the slightly more telling shots, is he therefore going to check 3 of the 4 boxes? Should a fighter landing the cleaner better shots AND showing a better defence be the ring general based on having 2 of the 3? Or could you give it to the agressor alone if he was really pressing and his opponent was reluctant to engage? It certainly happens all the time. It just depends what you like to see in the first place really.