Boxrec RULES!!!!

[XaduBoxer]

I haven't failed at all, my point stands you can't rank a fighter as #1 in a division they haven't fought in. I don't need boxrec to justify their flawed system.

Ahh welcome Mr. Perfect (never failed ) ... So you think you're larger than BoxRec and you will not hear their explanation why PAC is #1 at 140... Go on... live in your fantasy world...
.

Yes in my crazy fantasy world, you have to fight in a weight class to be ranked in it.

Sorry but that's not the case in real world rankings organization... Valero haven't fought at 135 yet but he's already ranked there by Fightnews (see not only BoxRec)... I think we have discussed this before (7 months ago?) in the case of PAC and Guzman being ranked at 135 even they have not fought yet in that division...

Anyway, it seems you're enjoying in your crazy fantasy world... continue living in it... coz what matters most is if you enjoy it or not...
.

[killersheep]

Ahh welcome Mr. Perfect (never failed ) ... So you think you're larger than BoxRec and you will not hear their explanation why PAC is #1 at 140... Go on... live in your fantasy world...
.

Yes in my crazy fantasy world, you have to fight in a weight class to be ranked in it.

Sorry but that's not the case in real world rankings organization... Valero haven't fought at 135 yet but he's already ranked there by Fightnews (see not only BoxRec)... I think we have discussed this before (7 months ago?) in the case of PAC and Guzman being ranked at 135 even they have not fought yet in that division...

Anyway, it seems you're enjoying in your crazy fantasy world... continue living in it... coz what matters most is if you enjoy it or not...
.

That's it? I thought for sure you would have tried to prove your point by now.