Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Trainer Monkey View Post
I dont see it as a robbery,I see it as one of the worst fights Ive ever watched, but not a robbery.
Valuev landed more effective blows,Holyfield threw more punches,but as often as not,hit low or the arms,and barely missed a deduction for head butting in to Valuevs chin.Also Holyfield faded in the second half.
That being said,I never want to see either of them in a ring again,as long as I live.It was the worst fight of the entire card.
Im having a hard time just getting Martin/Mahfood 2 even booked,and that crap was a $24 PPV?
TM no offense but you have some of the worst scoring i've ever seen, and from all the opinions i've seen on here and from boxing experts, they all say its a robbery and atleast 7 points + win for Evander Holyfield but you don't ? i thought when you thought Mikkel Kessler beat Joe Calzaghe was bad enough but this takes the biscuit.
I thought it was close
Holyfield barely threw a shot in the second half of the fight,and got repeatedly drilled to the body.
It was a crappy fight,but a decision that could have gone either way.
I loathed the fight,but I dont feel one way or the other about the decision. To take a belt its usually got to be decisive. While Valuevs elbows may hurt like hell tommorrow,it wasnt even close to decisive. What it really was,was boring as hell.
Both undercard matches were better..
To be the man,you have to beat the man,to quote Ric Flair.
Now could somebody please beat the man,so I dont have to watch that lumbering sasquatch anymore