Quote Originally Posted by Dizaster View Post
Like I said in another thread also, the judges should be taken though a reaply of the fight round by round, and explain with conviction how and why they gave each round to the fighter that they did.. It's reasonable to say that occassionaly different judges may look for different things to award points for, especially in a close fight where each fighter has different characteristics..

But in a case where it's clear as mud to 99% of people associated with boxing that a fighter was robbed of an entire fight, there needs to be some sort of explanation.. Preferably publicly..


For it to just be totally ignored like "Oh well, they were the 3 appointed judges, and that's how they saw it, so that's it" it's just total bullshit.. Especially on the world stage in what is supposed to be a professional organisation.... It just can't be ignored... Why the fuck is it being ignored is the question ??!!!!

Any other major sporting body would have to answer for stuff like this... Almost immediately! But boxing just plays by a different set of rules... I can see why people who are deep in the game can get really frustrated with it..
I just wrote them again. Thanks guys