Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Mikkel "The Viking Warrior" Kessler

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Mikkel "The Viking Warrior" Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Depending on what version of Taylor shows up....
    I agree...

    Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
    I think Jermain Taylor has looked pretty good in his last 2 fights, i think he matches up quite well with Mikkel Kessler.
    You think he looked good in his last 2 fights...

    He was out hustled vs. Pav in the rematch, yes he went the distance this time but still I wouldn't consider that a good performance considering he lost.

    Then he fought Lacy in one of the more boring fights of last year. A fight which he was dropped but the ref. called it a slip and JT was hurt. Let's be honest here Lacy is not the hardest boxer to outbox.

    I personally would say JT looked OK vs. Lacy he was working his jab and connecting with some good shots.


    Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
    It would be a tactical battle, and i could see him outboxing the much more robotic and stiff Mikkel Kessler.
    Kessler stiff & robotic? Really? Since when?

    Last I checked Kess was considered a good boxer with angles and good combinations, good foot movement in the ring and a very good jab.
    Yes i do think Jermain Taylor looked good in his last two fights, when he fought Kelly Pavlik. In there 2nd fight thats the best Jermain Taylor has ever looked in any of his championship fights. He threw good combinations and looked sharp.

    And also since when can't you look good just because you lose a fight ? i think everyone on this site was impressed with Jermain Taylor against Kelly Pavlik, and i think everyone agrees he looked better than he had in any other of his championship fights.

    Roberto did you not see the replay regarding the Jeff Lacy/Jermain Taylor knockdown ? the replay clearly showed it wasn't actually a knockdown, the punch was on JT's shoulder as i remember it.

    I don't know how you think Jermain Taylor didn't look good against Jeff Lacy, yes Jeff Lacy isn't one of the best Super Middleweights, but its still a decent win. And Jermain Taylor won almost every round except for 1 round on my card, and he was letting his hands go fine and his combinations looked pretty good to me. And i also agree with VD i didn't find the fight boring at all, let alone one of the most boring fights of the year, i think thats an over the top comment.

    And yes Mikkel Kessler is robotic and stiff how can you say he isn't ? he is a very good fighter with good skills and a good jab, but he is a typical European fighter who stands straight up, and is stiff in his upper body movement. And robotic like similar to Kelly Pavlik but not quite like that.
    Last edited by ICB; 01-06-2009 at 12:14 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    7,899
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Mikkel "The Viking Warrior" Kessler

    I used to like Kessler quite a bit,but since he hurt his hand before the Calzeghe fight, he doesnt look right.
    I dont know if he cant get over being overworked by Joe, and cant get his confidence back, or if the hand never healed right.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1315
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Mikkel "The Viking Warrior" Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by DaxxKahn View Post
    Depending on what version of Taylor shows up....
    I agree...


    You think he looked good in his last 2 fights...

    He was out hustled vs. Pav in the rematch, yes he went the distance this time but still I wouldn't consider that a good performance considering he lost.

    Then he fought Lacy in one of the more boring fights of last year. A fight which he was dropped but the ref. called it a slip and JT was hurt. Let's be honest here Lacy is not the hardest boxer to outbox.

    I personally would say JT looked OK vs. Lacy he was working his jab and connecting with some good shots.


    Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
    It would be a tactical battle, and i could see him outboxing the much more robotic and stiff Mikkel Kessler.
    Kessler stiff & robotic? Really? Since when?

    Last I checked Kess was considered a good boxer with angles and good combinations, good foot movement in the ring and a very good jab.
    Yes i do think Jermain Taylor looked good in his last two fights, when he fought Kelly Pavlik. In there 2nd fight thats the best Jermain Taylor has ever looked in any of his championship fights. He threw good combinations and looked sharp.

    And also since when can't you look good just because you lose a fight ? i think everyone on this site was impressed with Jermain Taylor against Kelly Pavlik, and i think everyone agrees he looked better than he had in any other of his championship fights.

    Roberto did you not see the replay regarding the Jeff Lacy/Jermain Taylor knockdown ? the replay clearly showed it wasn't actually a knockdown, the punch was on JT's shoulder as i remember it.

    I don't know how you think Jermain Taylor didn't look good against Jeff Lacy, yes Jeff Lacy isn't one of the best Super Middleweights, but its still a decent win. And Jermain Taylor won almost every round except for 1 round on my card, and he was letting his hands go fine and his combinations looked pretty good to me. And i also agree with VD i didn't find the fight boring at all, let alone one of the most boring fights of the year, i think thats an over the top comment.

    And yes Mikkel Kessler is robotic and stiff how can you say he isn't ? he is a very good fighter with good skills and a good jab, but he is a typical European fighter who stands straight up, and is stiff in his upper body movement. And robotic like similar to Kelly Pavlik but not quite like that.
    Kessler doesn't fight like Pavlik at all. That isn't a good comparison.

    Kessler may be robotic, but he is fast and fluid. I loved Emmanual Stewart's comment before the Calzaghe fight: "Like Kessler said, Calzaghe may be faster, but he's not THAT much faster."

    Kessler fought two gimme fights. No more. He needs international exposure. Unfortunately, given the current economic climate, Kessler may need to take riskier fights for less money than he is used to. Maybe he needs to fight on Versus?

    He came to NY to watch Calzaghe and Jones. He called out Bhop. He should fight Bhop at MSG or Atlantic City on HBO. Fighting Bute in Canada on Showtime would help too as would a fight with Jermain in Vegas on HBO. I would also understand a fight with Denis Inkin in Germany for the WB0 strap because it would build his resume although it may not help him obtain international exposure. Dawson at a catchweight of 170 would be interesting, but at 175 Dawson may be too much for Kessler. Or the risk may outweigh the reward. Kessler would dominate Froch and it wouldn't really garner him much exposure that he doesn't already have from British fans because of the media attention he received from the Calzaghe fight.

    Kessler fought last at the end of October. He is due to line up a fight soon. Anything less than the following opponents would be disappointing:
    1. Bhop at MSG at 170.
    2. Jermain for the WBA strap in Vegas.
    3. A fight for the IBF and WBA straps with Bute in Montreal.
    4. A fight for the WBO and WBA straps with Inkin in Germany.
    5. Dawson at a catchweight
    6. Some top ten opponent like Allen Green on Versus.

  4. #4
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Mikkel "The Viking Warrior" Kessler

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Nonito Donaire View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
    I agree...


    You think he looked good in his last 2 fights...

    He was out hustled vs. Pav in the rematch, yes he went the distance this time but still I wouldn't consider that a good performance considering he lost.

    Then he fought Lacy in one of the more boring fights of last year. A fight which he was dropped but the ref. called it a slip and JT was hurt. Let's be honest here Lacy is not the hardest boxer to outbox.

    I personally would say JT looked OK vs. Lacy he was working his jab and connecting with some good shots.



    Kessler stiff & robotic? Really? Since when?

    Last I checked Kess was considered a good boxer with angles and good combinations, good foot movement in the ring and a very good jab.
    Yes i do think Jermain Taylor looked good in his last two fights, when he fought Kelly Pavlik. In there 2nd fight thats the best Jermain Taylor has ever looked in any of his championship fights. He threw good combinations and looked sharp.

    And also since when can't you look good just because you lose a fight ? i think everyone on this site was impressed with Jermain Taylor against Kelly Pavlik, and i think everyone agrees he looked better than he had in any other of his championship fights.

    Roberto did you not see the replay regarding the Jeff Lacy/Jermain Taylor knockdown ? the replay clearly showed it wasn't actually a knockdown, the punch was on JT's shoulder as i remember it.

    I don't know how you think Jermain Taylor didn't look good against Jeff Lacy, yes Jeff Lacy isn't one of the best Super Middleweights, but its still a decent win. And Jermain Taylor won almost every round except for 1 round on my card, and he was letting his hands go fine and his combinations looked pretty good to me. And i also agree with VD i didn't find the fight boring at all, let alone one of the most boring fights of the year, i think thats an over the top comment.

    And yes Mikkel Kessler is robotic and stiff how can you say he isn't ? he is a very good fighter with good skills and a good jab, but he is a typical European fighter who stands straight up, and is stiff in his upper body movement. And robotic like similar to Kelly Pavlik but not quite like that.
    Kessler doesn't fight like Pavlik at all. That isn't a good comparison.

    Kessler may be robotic, but he is fast and fluid. I loved Emmanual Stewart's comment before the Calzaghe fight: "Like Kessler said, Calzaghe may be faster, but he's not THAT much faster."

    Kessler fought two gimme fights. No more. He needs international exposure. Unfortunately, given the current economic climate, Kessler may need to take riskier fights for less money than he is used to. Maybe he needs to fight on Versus?

    He came to NY to watch Calzaghe and Jones. He called out Bhop. He should fight Bhop at MSG or Atlantic City on HBO. Fighting Bute in Canada on Showtime would help too as would a fight with Jermain in Vegas on HBO. I would also understand a fight with Denis Inkin in Germany for the WB0 strap because it would build his resume although it may not help him obtain international exposure. Dawson at a catchweight of 170 would be interesting, but at 175 Dawson may be too much for Kessler. Or the risk may outweigh the reward. Kessler would dominate Froch and it wouldn't really garner him much exposure that he doesn't already have from British fans because of the media attention he received from the Calzaghe fight.

    Kessler fought last at the end of October. He is due to line up a fight soon. Anything less than the following opponents would be disappointing:
    1. Bhop at MSG at 170.
    2. Jermain for the WBA strap in Vegas.
    3. A fight for the IBF and WBA straps with Bute in Montreal.
    4. A fight for the WBO and WBA straps with Inkin in Germany.
    5. Dawson at a catchweight
    6. Some top ten opponent like Allen Green on Versus.
    I never said Mikkel Kessler fights like Kelly Pavlik read what i said carefully, i said there both robot like but i said not quite the same. I didn't say they have the same fighting style.

    Although i don't think there much different in some attributes, they both rely alot on there jab/right hand although Mikkel Kessler has more variety. Mikkel Kessler clearly has more tools but if you actually think about it, there not a whole lot different.

    But the big difference is that Kelly Pavlik is a much more come forward aggressive, and Mikkel Kessler is much more of a boxer but i've seen Mikkel Kessler come forward like Kelly Pavlik before. But there still both robotic there footwork is pretty slow, and they often rely on the same combination, and there defense at times is very leaky.
    Last edited by ICB; 01-06-2009 at 03:34 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Danilo Haussler Says "Mikkel Kessler is Beatable"
    By jangeorg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 08:51 PM
  2. Mikkel Kessler"I Dream Of Joe Calzaghe Rematch
    By jangeorg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 05-28-2008, 11:14 AM
  3. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-21-2008, 06:00 PM
  4. Mikkel Kessler "Joe Calzaghe Crushed My Dream"
    By chamiley in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 44
    Last Post: 11-06-2007, 11:10 AM
  5. Mikkel Kessler - a tribute to the Viking Warrior
    By jangeorg in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 04-18-2007, 02:11 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing