Glaringly obvious case of a fighter not needing a trinket to call himself a Champion.The man is a realist.And I do believe he will fight Barrera.
Call me a cynic,he'll need to watch his back in that WBA defense,and not only from Funekas side!
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Array
Glaringly obvious case of a fighter not needing a trinket to call himself a Champion.The man is a realist.And I do believe he will fight Barrera.
Call me a cynic,he'll need to watch his back in that WBA defense,and not only from Funekas side!
Ive been around Nate and he is definately a no nonsense kind of guy. Hes a sharp thinker that understands the sport, also funny as hell. He really enjoys being a fighter and definately likes being Nate Campbell.
Only Forum Amature With Well Over 2000 Posts!
Array
That is why the alphabet titles are pure bull shit. They are not lost and won in the ring.
Nate should throw them all in the trash and just start taking out everyone until he can get a title shot from JMM.
Array
Well done Nate, go get that paper...![]()
I like Nate too but I wish him the worst of luck if he ever meets Barrera
Nate used to be a fool when he fought Pedan but hes paid his dues now I hope he earns well from his titles.
I thought the WBA created the "super champion" designation so unified belt holders would not have to worry about mandatories (and so they could create the bogus "regular" title, thus putting more sanctioning fees in their pockets)?
Array
The super champion was created to so that the WBA could collect mandatories for both titles. The super champion has a few extra months to make his mandatory.
With their 3 champions per division, the WBA is going to ruin the whole alphabet system. Look at Nate Campbel. He had three alphabet trinkets and no one cared. Imagine if he did that 15 years ago. He would have been much more in demand.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks