Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 27

Thread: # of fights in relation to greatness of a fighter

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Redondo Beach CA
    Posts
    975
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1382
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: # of fights in relation to greatness of a fighter

    I am in total agreement that the quality of a fighters opponents matters most, but is there nothing to say about longevity, consistency, or just an overall will to keep fighting?

    I mean its not easy to want to keep going for longer than you need to. If you have secured a legacy but want to keep going because you love to fight, that says alot also. If my hypothetical fighter beat the same guys but instead of doing it back to back he did it in six years (one every year) and padded his record in between and got up to 48-O fighting bums alls the way but fighting 6-7 times a year, is there nothing to be said about that consistency or workrate?
    The key is Self-discipline.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    2,679
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2389
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: # of fights in relation to greatness of a fighter

    Quote Originally Posted by OnixAA View Post
    If a fighter has 100 fights say like JCC does that mean he is remembered as a greater figter than a guy with say 50 fights? I know that opposition plays a role and that in 100 fights you have alot of bums in there but that also shows alot of persistency.

    Here's a super hypothetical.

    Let's say there is a guy out there who's 5-1 (5KO) right now, and for some reason Mayweather took him as a tune up and the guy wins. Then goes on the following run...

    Mayweather
    Cotto
    Pacquiao
    Margarito
    Hatton
    Williams

    I dont know why or how this happens it just does, now the guy is 11-1 (11KO) and he retires. Does the fact that he only had 12 fights make him less of a great fighter as opposed to having the same fights listed above, but padding his record with lesser fights up to say 40-1?

    Whats your take?
    Honestly, someone who is 5-1 would never get a shot at a big name. They would find someone who was washed up and somewhat of a name or someone whose style matches up well with them.

    But someone who would be able to pull that off would be LEGEN...(wait for it)...DARY

    And my opinion on the topic, chalk another one up for Quality over Quantity. Look at Edwin Valero, he is on one of the hottest knockout streaks out there yet people still don't believe in him because his opposition has no quality. 24 fights, 24 knockouts, amazing on paper, but in reality, not all that impressive. Now look at Nonito Donaire. 20 fights (13 by KO), and 1 loss. He fought one name in Darchynian and he is held in higher regard because he took a name out.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 51
    Last Post: 11-07-2008, 04:15 PM
  2. Replies: 17
    Last Post: 10-29-2008, 02:08 PM
  3. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 07-26-2007, 02:53 PM
  4. RANDOM FIGHTER SELECTED FOR FUTURE GREATNESS!!!
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 01-13-2007, 05:32 AM
  5. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-13-2006, 05:38 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing