Tyson vs Holyfield - who of them is better fighter?

[CutMeMick]

Good day. Happy New Year to everyone I wish!
All of us remember many disputes (all over the world) on Tyson and Lewis's theme who from them is greater or more legendary, and many other things. At present it is represented to me interesting to discuss "face to face" Mike Tyson and Evander Holyfield, to discuss them not from the point of view of statistics and figures, titles, belts, comparison of opposition or records. To me interestingly what they were as boxers, are how much good or bad, than are good and than are not so good.
As to Mike in its best years, I saw in him very good aggressive “shorty” counterpuncher. With fine technics and skills, feeling of a distance and a rhythm in actions, fine feeling of the opponent. His technics and skills were almost ideally combined with his natural parametres. Then in due course Mike became easier, also more predicted, but on any very long remained terrible force.
Holyfield in cruiserweight and times of heavyweight differed a little. Despite the universality and brilliant skills being cruiser he didn’t hesitate to impose to contenders rate and without ceremony could break them physically, many times taking fight inside. Passing in heavyweight to him it was necessary to calm the passion though, but all the same there was an aspiration to combat "a bone in a bone" a little if it is most favourably for him.
They in a ring met twice, and both times the victory remained beyond Evander. The fact is also that in the second fight they have a little held back each other. I saw their career of professional boxers from beginning to end, and I dare to assert that in their fight in any years, taking into account their styles, merits and demerits, Evander it would appear more strongly and beat Mike any time, any place, anywhere.
What opinions are?

Welcome aboard Adler you've just signed up the best boxing site on the net bar none...

Hope you stick around and remember protect yourself at all times.


As for your question it's def. one that can be disected in so many different ways.
Skill wise I'd have to go with Tyson, because I think he was more versatile where as Holy became more of a warrior and often got into wars leaving his skills sidelined.
Career wise I'd have to go with Holy, longevity alone does it add the quality of opposition and he leaves Tyson in the dust.

Overall? Shit... I'd side with Holy.

[GAME]

Id go with Holyfield too

I was of the beleif that a prime Tyson could beat anybody but Evander just has more dimensions to him . He can do it all .Id lean towards evander but its a tough call

[Puerto Rican Punch]

My opinion is that Holyfield is better than Tyson. Holyfield is a great athlete with a great heart, and great skills. He is a true warrior...

Tyson was great, he had speed, could chase his opponents passing punches and reaching spots with his head-torso movements, and most of all had a devastating power. However, Holyfield was a more complete fighter and who beat Tyson twice. I was amazed how fresh Holyfield looked at the end of the first fight... what an athlete... Holyfield also had to fight and beat bigger, stronger opponents without having Tyson's KO punch, but he could use his skills and heart to win.

I vote for Holyfield...

[SaltyBacon]

holyfield

[Adler]

At this moment:

Holyfield 16
Tyson 8
no choyce 2

[Boom Boom]

Holyfield had longevity and a bigger heart than Tyson. Im a big fan of both but Holyfield was a bit better. Tyson was great for a couple years, but Holyfield was great for a couple decades.

[CGM]

Used to see the same sort of argument in chess all the time. With very little agreement. Who was the greatest chessplayer of all time?

Garry Kasparov of Russia was the #1 ranked player in the world for over 20 years. But Bobby Fischer of the USA, for about a five year period before he disappeared, dominated his contemporaries like no player before or since. Take your pick.

[iwng100]

Used to see the same sort of argument in chess all the time. With very little agreement. Who was the greatest chessplayer of all time?

Garry Kasparov of Russia was the #1 ranked player in the world for over 20 years. But Bobby Fischer of the USA, for about a five year period before he disappeared, dominated his contemporaries like no player before or since. Take your pick.

Very good comparison but like in Tyson case there wasn't any really competition for Fischer in that era
and if remember well the former champion Mihail Tall (one of the few “ATG” that he fought) had a positive score on him (4:1)
Therefore I’d pick Kasparov and Holyfield.

[ElTerribleMorales]

I'd say from Amateurs to Pros Holyfield accomplished a lot more than Tyson, only thing Mike did that Holyfield didn't was become the youngest HW champion, yet hes a 2 division undisputed champion, IMO one of if not the greatest Cruiserweights ever, and well just the level of competition and ability to come back from diversity in and out of the ring (heart problem) overall makes him a better fighter

[CGM]

Used to see the same sort of argument in chess all the time. With very little agreement. Who was the greatest chessplayer of all time?

Garry Kasparov of Russia was the #1 ranked player in the world for over 20 years. But Bobby Fischer of the USA, for about a five year period before he disappeared, dominated his contemporaries like no player before or since. Take your pick.

Very good comparison but like in Tyson case there wasn't any really competition for Fischer in that era
and if remember well the former champion Mihail Tall (one of the few “ATG” that he fought) had a positive score on him (4:1)
Therefore I’d pick Kasparov and Holyfield.

Oh Christ, this I did not want to debate. But ok, I'll bite.

Yes Kasparov had a longer run at the top. Yes he had Karpov to play against, who was very close to him in ability. But that begs the question, doesn't it?

Look at Fischer's winning percentage over the last five years of his career, and compare it to anyone in the twentieth century, including Kasparov.

Fischer's losses against Tal came early in his career, when Fischer was still in his teens.

To say that Fischer had no good competition is wrong.

But don't take my word for it. Check out what Kasparov himself had to say on the issue. And Kasparov is not one who is given to false modesty, believe me.

You can check my discussion with ICB for my Tyson support.

Montreal rocks! The Habs kind of suck though.

[Adler]

Welcome aboard Adler you've just signed up the best boxing site on the net bar none...

Hope you stick around and remember protect yourself at all times.

Thank you, hope to be able do my best

I always thought about clash between them in 1989. Mike was undisputed, Evan was growing up in heavyweight rattings. But Mike's shape was very under question than. Divorcing with Givens, Rooney was out. I suppose Holyfield coul broke him down if King get the fight than.

[Von Milash]

Where were Holyfield and Lewis when Mike was steamrolling the entire HW division?

In the late 80s, Mike beats any HW, alive or dead. Awesome power, hard chin, grit, etc.

That twot of a girl ruined his life and then it was over.

[ICB]

Where were Holyfield and Lewis when Mike was steamrolling the entire HW division?

In the late 80s, Mike beats any HW, alive or dead. Awesome power, hard chin, grit, etc.

That twot of a girl ruined his life and then it was over.

Where was Lennox Lewis, Evander Holyfield ? Evander Holyfield was at Cruiserweight and Lennox Lewis was still an Amateur. The big question is where was Mike Tyson in 1991 when he could of fought Evander Holyfield and pulled out on a rib injury, they could of easily set another date.

And where was Mike Tyson in 1996 when he got offered the Lennox Lewis fight, but instead he payed Lennox Lewis money to side step as i remember rightly ?

[rjj tszyu]

Where were Holyfield and Lewis when Mike was steamrolling the entire HW division?

In the late 80s, Mike beats any HW, alive or dead. Awesome power, hard chin, grit, etc.

That twot of a girl ruined his life and then it was over.

Where was Lennox Lewis, Evander Holyfield ? Evander Holyfield was at Cruiserweight and Lennox Lewis was still an Amateur. The big question is where was Mike Tyson in 1991 when he could of fought Evander Holyfield and pulled out on a rib injury, they could of easily set another date.

And where was Mike Tyson in 1996 when he got offered the Lennox Lewis fight, but instead he payed Lennox Lewis money to side step as i remember rightly ?

Nice answer!

Anything with Mike Tyson being compared to ATG fighters will be hard to call because when he was supposed to be in his pomp (1986-1989 according to his fans), there wasn't really any competition for him to be matched with to see how good he really was. The strange thing for me was as soon as there was and he got beat off Evander and Lewis he was no longer the man he was despite being younger and in less wars than them two.

I look at things like this. He fought two ATG's and lost against both of them. I'm not saying Tyson isn't an ATG himself he's just not as good as some of his fans make out!

[CGM]

Where were Holyfield and Lewis when Mike was steamrolling the entire HW division?

In the late 80s, Mike beats any HW, alive or dead. Awesome power, hard chin, grit, etc.

That twot of a girl ruined his life and then it was over.

Where was Lennox Lewis, Evander Holyfield ? Evander Holyfield was at Cruiserweight and Lennox Lewis was still an Amateur. The big question is where was Mike Tyson in 1991 when he could of fought Evander Holyfield and pulled out on a rib injury, they could of easily set another date.

And where was Mike Tyson in 1996 when he got offered the Lennox Lewis fight, but instead he payed Lennox Lewis money to side step as i remember rightly ?

Nice answer!

Anything with Mike Tyson being compared to ATG fighters will be hard to call because when he was supposed to be in his pomp (1986-1989 according to his fans), there wasn't really any competition for him to be matched with to see how good he really was. The strange thing for me was as soon as there was and he got beat off Evander and Lewis he was no longer the man he was despite being younger and in less wars than them two.

I look at things like this. He fought two ATG's and lost against both of them. I'm not saying Tyson isn't an ATG himself he's just not as good as some of his fans make out!

We could say the same thing about Holyfield. After all, the best two fighters he fought he lost to ( Bowe and Lewis), and other guys he beat at heavyweight weren't exactly stars. Not saying he's not an ATG, just that he's not as good as some of his fans make out!!