He was never unbeatable or anywhere near it he had some bad struggles even in his prime. He was very talented no doubt about it and he had some very good performances against B class fighters like Steve Robinson ETC.
But his balance was terrible at times, and when he pulled back which is a boxing error he did used to get caught quite often. And his punches were wild/swinging punches which often left him open for counters.
But i'll give him credit when i was young i would always watch him, whether you loved him or hate him. He put asses in seats and gave you your money's worth. So you can't really argue with that.
But was he anymore talented than other British fighters who used the low hand style. Like Kirkland Laing ? Herol Graham ? i mean the way people go on about him at times is like he was a sensation and people had never seen, anything like that before in a British fighter.
But as i just said the British fighters above were just as talented, and used the low hand style just like Naseem Hamed. Naseem Hamed was very talented but he also gets overrated at times, most of his best performances were against B class fighters.
He also retired when he lost and never comeback which a true champion does, sure he had one comeback after the MAB fight. But basically after he lost to MAB his career was over.
Which showed me the mentality of Naseem Hamed, if he had comeback and atleast tried to of got a rematch with MAB, or took on fighters like Erik Morales or ETC.
And he had lost i would of still respected him for trying, i don't like Amir Khan but atleast he's got the bottle to step back in the ring after an embarrassing loss.
And try and get to the top because thats what real fighters do, and that part of Naseem Hamed's game was missing which stopped him being a real/great fighter.
Bookmarks