Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    And how would either of them done without the clinch? I mean Hatton didn't get to show everything against Mayweather because Cortez was always breaking them up, and I think that hurt Hatton in that fight. Not that he would have won because Mayweather has amazing defensive against anything but a fast southpaw, but it really changed that fight, it changed Holyfield-Tyson, it changes every Klitschko fight. I kept saying that all Cotto needed to do was clinch more and work out of the clinch, and muscle Margarito around, and thats what Mosley did, and I feel vindicated in that.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1978
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    There wasn't a ref in the world who could have saved Tony tonight. He was dominated. Yes, a few more clinches might have allowed Cotto go the distance an lose a decision instead of being stopped. If the ref had been stupid as the ref in the Berto fight, it wouldn't have mattered because Shane was getting the better of Tony inside. Perhaps it would have gone on a little longer, but in the the end would have been the same. The ref being overly sensitive to clinches helped Collazo and contributed to it being a very close fight that many people think Collazo won, yes. Maybe Berto wins two more rounds if he was allowed to clinch. Either way, same result. Berto won.

    Tony got his ass kicked from LA to TJ. Beaten, dominated. It was not unlike the way Mayweather dismantled Hatton. If Hatton had been allow by Cortez to clinch more, would Hatton have won? I think not. Maybe he doesn't get KO'd, but he still loses. With or without a single clinch, Tony was going to lose the fight, just like Cotto would have lost (but probably gone the distance) if he would have clinched more.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    I think a warning and a point deduction would have been completely acceptable. It wouldnt have changed the fact that Mosley was winning every round though. It wouldnt have made too much of a difference IMO.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    None of your buisness.
    Posts
    7,691
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1806
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    Tony almost tackles people he comes forward so much, instead of getting bullrushed into the ropes like Cotto, Shane decided to tie him up and hold his ground. Leave it to Teath to nit-pick a brilliant performance by Shane....

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    Sigh did you guys see Cotto-Margarito? Cotto was dominating Margarito for the first six rounds on the inside, on the outside, everywhere. Mosley never let Margarito get off on the inside, and they hardly fought on the inside that much. It mostly involved Mosley moving away or standing at distance and loading up on shots, Margarito needs you on the ropes before he can be truly effective, and Mosley due to clinching was allowed to reduce his output in order to never get caught on the ropes, Margarito is like a train, and he needs to build momentum, but because of clinching he could never get that momentum going, I love that Mosley did it. Margarito is maybe the only guy at the top of the sport that I hate and nobody is happier that he lost than me. I am just saying refs can change fights.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Los Scandalous, CA
    Posts
    30,802
    Mentioned
    51 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    5045
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    If my grandma had wings she'd be a plane...

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    Quote Originally Posted by Taeth View Post
    Sigh did you guys see Cotto-Margarito? Cotto was dominating Margarito for the first six rounds on the inside, on the outside, everywhere. Mosley never let Margarito get off on the inside, and they hardly fought on the inside that much. It mostly involved Mosley moving away or standing at distance and loading up on shots, Margarito needs you on the ropes before he can be truly effective, and Mosley due to clinching was allowed to reduce his output in order to never get caught on the ropes, Margarito is like a train, and he needs to build momentum, but because of clinching he could never get that momentum going, I love that Mosley did it. Margarito is maybe the only guy at the top of the sport that I hate and nobody is happier that he lost than me. I am just saying refs can change fights.
    A lot of things can change how a fight looks but Margarito was going to lose. It was one sided, man. Please listen to yourself my friend. This is a trivial topic. Mosley landed that right hand all night and going to the body early and often is what kept Margarito honest in his bull charging tactic. He had to bring his elbows down and this delays the timing on his headshots. How about we talk about what really could've changed the fight significantly, the plaster in his handwraps. I'm sure the punches would've been more significant and Tony would've threw his 100 any kind of punches just so he could land as many as he would know he just needs to land punches. And his confidence would've been much more solid coming into the fight and throughout trouble in the fight.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    6,706
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1529
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What if they had the ref from the 17th.

    I don't see how knowledgable people think Margarito not being able to throw a hundred or more punches a round doesn't change things... If Mosley doesn't clinch, Tony throws more punches, and then Mosley doesn't have the space.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Happy Birthday Manny Pacquiao, Dec. 17th.
    By KananKrus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 12-19-2008, 05:07 AM
  2. Jeff Lacey back May 17th?
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 02:42 PM
  3. Mosley-Judah set for May 17th on PPV
    By jaz_pagan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 02-16-2008, 12:43 AM
  4. Zab back on November 17th
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 09-23-2007, 05:59 AM
  5. Wright looks for double KO on June 17th
    By Gandalf in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-29-2006, 11:04 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing