Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1985
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Jess Wilard was known for beating a tired old Johnson and taking the worst beating in boxing history. He's in the HOF! Understand the standard has been set already. You can't unring a bell. Jerry Quarry is better than Braddock and Wilard. It's not like baseball where a player has to have 500 HR or 3,000 hits. There is no real standard. Jerry belongs in the hall.
    Yeah but as has already been noted both Wilard and Braddock meant much more to boxing history than Quarry did.

    Also both Willard and Braddock were undisputed heavyweight champs, Quarrey never was.
    Man come on. I think we both know Quarry would have been champion in their era. We must look at the era at which they fought. Quarry era was much,much tougher that Braddock or Wilard.
    No, we don't. Braddock was never KO'd and stopped only once on cuts and they were fighting without chambered gloves at the time. He fought half his career with a broken hand. Quarry was KO'd 6 times. There is no way you can say Quarry was TOUGHER than Braddock.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Louisville,ky
    Posts
    1,436
    Mentioned
    39 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1010
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Quote Originally Posted by RozzySean View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mrbig1 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post

    Yeah but as has already been noted both Wilard and Braddock meant much more to boxing history than Quarry did.

    Also both Willard and Braddock were undisputed heavyweight champs, Quarrey never was.
    Man come on. I think we both know Quarry would have been champion in their era. We must look at the era at which they fought. Quarry era was much,much tougher that Braddock or Wilard.
    No, we don't. Braddock was never KO'd and stopped only once on cuts and they were fighting without chambered gloves at the time. He fought half his career with a broken hand. Quarry was KO'd 6 times. There is no way you can say Quarry was TOUGHER than Braddock.
    You do know Braddock has loss 26 times right?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2341
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    I think so!

    He fought the best fighters of his era (arguably the best era ever)

    You got guys like Johannson (RIP) in there, then I think its only fitting to put a tough SOB like Quarry in there too!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2341
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    IMO if you put Quarry in any other era he could have & probably would have been among top guys... I think that says a lot about him!
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    IMO if you put Quarry in any other era he could have & probably would have been among top guys... I think that says a lot about him!
    You could say that about putting Tim Witherspoon in the current era though, it's irelevent.

    You can't put someone in the Hall of Fame based on how you think they might have done in a different era, the Hall of Fame is about ACTUAL acomplishments not fantasy

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2341
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    IMO if you put Quarry in any other era he could have & probably would have been among top guys... I think that says a lot about him!
    You could say that about putting Tim Witherspoon in the current era though, it's irelevent.

    You can't put someone in the Hall of Fame based on how you think they might have done in a different era, the Hall of Fame is about ACTUAL acomplishments not fantasy
    Agree & imo how Quarry performed in what is arguably the best heavyweight era ever is an accomplishment within itself...

    Johnannson is in there, Braddock is in there & I feel Quaary should be too
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    IMO if you put Quarry in any other era he could have & probably would have been among top guys... I think that says a lot about him!
    You could say that about putting Tim Witherspoon in the current era though, it's irelevent.

    You can't put someone in the Hall of Fame based on how you think they might have done in a different era, the Hall of Fame is about ACTUAL acomplishments not fantasy
    Agree & imo how Quarry performed in what is arguably the best heavyweight era ever is an accomplishment within itself...

    Johnannson is in there, Braddock is in there & I feel Quaary should be too
    Both Braddock and Johannson were world champs though! And both were part of boxing history, Braddock as the Cinderella Man who inspired a nation during the depression era and Johannson who was involved in arguably the greatest fight trilogy of all time.

    Quarry may have been able to beat them both (but just an assumption) but he never won a belt and wasn't involved in any great defining moment other than being a competitive opponent against the best fighters in his era.

    Both Braddock and Johansson are famous outside of boxing for their acomplishments, Quarry is known in boxing circles only. If you go on acomplishments he doesn't get in, and if you go on FAME he still doesn't get in.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should Jerry Quarry be in the HOF?

    Should also mentione that Johansson died only a week ago too so RIP to a great fighter and some great memories

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Jerry Quarry! Wow, check this out
    By Jimanuel Boogustus in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-15-2008, 04:24 AM
  2. Boxing Legends Jerry Quarry
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-13-2007, 12:15 PM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 09-01-2006, 03:04 PM
  4. Ali V Jerry Quarry II
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-07-2006, 08:27 PM
  5. A Forgotten Heavyweight - Jerry Quarry
    By BIG H in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-30-2006, 07:47 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing