This is probably going to be throw a trainer under the bus day.
This is probably going to be throw a trainer under the bus day.
Mid March on the substance? How tough can it be to identify?![]()
I thought the same. This is smelling fishy. I think the business side of boxing is coming out again. I think they're looking for a way to put it all on the trainer. Margarito has become a cash cow afterall. I may be getting too cynical but I just can't trust boxing anymore. I seen and heard too many dirty things get swept under the rug.
Maybe it's an alien subtance from the Roswell crash site that margarito bought. That's why they don't know what it is.
This situation looks really bad .........................
Can we think that Guevara testimony would be enough to finish the Margaros career ?
IMO i guess so, because Margaro cant say that he didnt know it that they would putting an illegal Pads in his Wraps.................
Im not saying this , that was Guevara................is sad mannnnnn
You guys need to think a little harder than that... come on!
Ever hear of a back log? Labs can't just drop everything in line to test a sports case. Example:LAPD Rape Kit Backlog Could Be Cleared by 2010 - KNBC-TV- msnbc.com
Don't look very good for Margarito, I don't think they are going to believe he didn't know what was in his hand wrapping. Specifically do to the lawyer they brought in. It even looks more suspect to me the fact that he did bring in a high powered Attorney or at least Arum thinks he needs one.
You bring up thinking harder, then suggest it is guilty looking because he has a good attorney?
He and his promoter can afford the best obviously, and the man is currently fighting to save his livelihood and reputation. What you think he should do....go with a court appointed lawyer?
Geez, like we didn't see this coming a mile away.
Antonio Margarito's trainer takes blame for hand-wrapping scandal | The Fabulous Forum | Los Angeles Times
Any updates on Tonys testimony,wasn't he up before Trainer??
Dude....It's not a contradiction! Not only that, the subjects are separated by a paragraph. Think harder, specifically refers to that fact that your response to the amount of time it takes to find out exactly what the substance is, is merely superficial.
It's a statement of the obvious! You don't bring in a well known lawyer that defended against someone that got off and where he was actually guilty. You bring in someone that at least had the appearance of innocence. Did you even hear of "Guilt by Association"?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks