no it just proves the same thing he proved when he beat Morales for the 2nd time, that basically he was in against a shot fighter or in DLH's case maybe not fully shot but a weight drained fighter, and how would Hatton beating Pacquiao prove anything?Hatton is getting to fight Pacquiao in his best weight class, he doesn't have to drain himself to go down to 135, Pacquiao/Hatton is completely irrelevant to DLH/Pacquiao, all in all i still give credit to Pacquiao, no so much on his win against DLH, but the way he fought, how he showcased exactly how much more skilled he has become, all the different punches that are in his arsinal i don't dispute the fact that Pacquiao is p4p the best fighter in the world, but he didn't beat a prime DLH, and a prime DLH would have beaten Pacquiao easily
Bookmarks