Quote Originally Posted by p4pking
Quote Originally Posted by wacko3205
Quote Originally Posted by cymru_am_byth
impossible to say wacko many thought mc'clennan was gonna beat benn and he was the dominant middleweight at that time in the US that is , but could you imagine jones / eubank that would of been interesting, for me eubank beat jones because he was so unothoradox ,had a great punch and chin , jones beats benn and jones edges watson, cant really speak for bernard not seen many of his earlier fights . lol
Sorry about the late

Another post & alcohol took over...these things happen.

Yeah...you are correct...it is impossible to say...but I alway scompared them fight for fightEubank/Benn/Jones & Jones always looked faster, more accurate, & the slickest of the group...& I aint just sayin that because Ima Yank.

To me, & Hopkins is my favorite, I think that he woulda outslicked em all including Jones had they have fought at the correct times.

Jones vs Hopkins has always been a controversial fight for me...just like Jones Tarver I...I know everyone hates me for it...but Tarver won that first fight.
How. Jones won at least 7, more like 8 rounds... and he was beating up on Tarver for the 12th to absolutely seal the win.. Tarver did a good job at trying to steal rounds but you can't just fight for 20 seconds if the other guy has been even remotely active for the majority of the round.. And how was Jones Hopkins contraversial for you, btw.... You can't tell me Hopkins deserved anything more than he got...
I agree about this one... Tarver lost against Roy easily in the first fight for me easy fight to judge... Jones landed more clean shots, and gutted it out moreso than Tarver did especially considering him comming down in weight.