To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
Little Aussie Battler
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Answer the question do u believe Manny should be ranked P4P #5?Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
I agree with Ring Mag, Manny should be ranked #5 at welterweight...
1. Shane Mosley
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito
4. Joshua Clottey
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Carlos Quintana
7. Andre Berto
8. Luis Collazo
9. Zab Judah
10. Isaac Hlatswayo
Little Aussie Battler
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Why wont u answer the question? I'll ask again. Do u agree with Boxrec that Manny is P4P #5? Simple yes or no will suffice.... Scared to answer are u?I agree with Ring Mag, Manny should be ranked #5 at welterweight...
1. Shane Mosley
2. Miguel Cotto
3. Antonio Margarito
4. Joshua Clottey
5. Manny Pacquiao
6. Carlos Quintana
7. Andre Berto
8. Luis Collazo
9. Zab Judah
10. Isaac Hlatswayo
Just a dude in blue.
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
I think the Ring is out to lunch on that 147 top ten ranking with Pacquiao,in a huge way.They ran that on ESPN last week,Was I seeing things??Can live with but disagree with them having Pacquiao at #1 p4p but last I checked Delahypa was not a ranked welter but a ranked jr.Middle prior to the fight.So what....Pacquiao #3 Jr.Middle
Last edited by Spicoli; 03-06-2009 at 12:36 AM.
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
YES... I agree with Ring Magazine that PAC is still the #1 P4P boxer as confirmed in their website's P4P list updated March 1, 2009:
Little Aussie Battler
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
That is not what i asked. Do u or do u not agree with the Boxrec P4P rankings which place Manny at #5? Easy question, only a dumbass wouldnt answer.YES... I agree with Ring Magazine that PAC is still the #1 P4P boxer as confirmed in their website's P4P list updated March 1, 2009:
Just a dude in blue.
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
Of course you doYES... I agree with Ring Magazine that PAC is still the #1 P4P boxer as confirmed in their website's P4P list updated March 1, 2009:
.....but what about lil Box-rec and #5......
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
I agree with Yahoo P4P list with PAC at #1 getting 30 out of 30 first place votes...
1. Manny Pacquiao Points: 300 (30 of 30 first-place votes)
2. Juan Manuel Marquez Points: 261
3. Israel Vazquez Points: 205
4. Bernard Hopkins Points: 197 ½
5. Shane Mosley Points: 131
6. Rafael Marquez Points: 123
7. Paul Williams Points: 108
8. Miguel Cotto Points: 84
9. Ivan Calderon Points: 60
10. Vic Darchinyan Points: 52
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true!!!!
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true
Link please... No links means it photochopped...
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
don't deny it,
To those who has problems with the above rankings, you can email your protest letter to:
zaduboxer @ fightnews . com
zaduboxer @ boxrec . com
Thank you...
.
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true
Link please... No links means it photochopped...
.it's just making a point, that just cause something's written on a site, it doesn't make it true....damn that Rain Man syndrome seems more like reality on every post
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
don't deny it,
oh look there, since it says it on Fightnews and Boxrec i guess it must be true
Link please... No links means it photochopped...
.
Well, what I posted are from actual real popular boxing websites. They published these rankings for the whole world to see and they're confident enough that they can back up what they published to the public...
There could be a possibility of an error in these rankings but 2 rankings organizations proclaiming PAC as no. 1 at 140 is reliable enough... They have their own basis for these rankings...
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
yea it's called lots of money and lots of crackdon't deny it,
Link please... No links means it photochopped...
.
Well, what I posted are from actual real popular boxing websites. They published these rankings for the whole world to see and they're confident enough that they can back up what they published to the public...
There could be a possibility of an error in these rankings but 2 rankings organizations proclaiming PAC as no. 1 at 140 is reliable enough... They have their own basis for these rankings...
.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs.
FightNews ranked PAC as no. 1 boxer at 140 lbs........... votes were made and since they're not bias... I fully agree with it.
After keeping my silence regarding Pac, it's time to give my full support to the man starting now. I'm in debate mood and to all Pac's detractors.... since you were all too nice with all Pacfans.... it's time for me to go nuts again.
Pac deserved to be number 1 there since he was jumping in weights and he just recently vacated his title at 135.
Pac is undoubtedly pound for pound #1 and he deserves to be placed as number 1 in a division in which he intends to stay.
If you can't take it, write to fight news and make your moronic complaints there.
Saddoboxer was just posting something which he has seen from other sites. Why ridicule him for those information?
Ikariam
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks