Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by CutMeMick View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
i agree with you that it would be no walk in the park, but i think that goes for both fighters, Griffith recovered well but he also could be hurt, Paret wasn't really a big puncher and he hurt Griffith by his own admission multiple times, so i'd say that Trinidad would hurt Griffith late (at around the 11th, and after picking himself up off the floor) and would stop him on the ropes for a standing TKO, but can easily see it go for Griffith, really a 50/50 fight

MAB Vs JC Chavez at 130
Emile was ONLY stopped twice in his career once as stated and the other by Monzon. He fought some of the hardest hitters in history I personally think he'd handle Tito well. Being hurt is one thing, I mean Trinidads chin in itself isn't the best, he used to hit the canvas often and hit the canvas in a lot of his fights by lesser punchers then Emile but notice how I went with the decision. Cortes dropped him, Stephens, Carr, Campas, Lushing dropped him.
But I just feel that it doesn't mean Emile would drop him...
agreed that Trinidad was floored a bit, that's why i said that Emille would probably have dropped him, but not stop him, i only went with Trinidad stopping him due to the fact that Tito was a GREAT finisher, once he had his man hurt he would systematically take him apart, not just throw wild punches, he'd mix it to the head and to the body, honestly like i said i find it a 50/50 fight, a winnable fight for both guys and by both ways KO just as easy as a decision, would have been classic
Good stuff man...
I def. agree and think it's winnable for either man.
You clearly state that you feel Tito would be the better man and he's had some great nights in his career.
I think Emiles a better fighter all around and is more versatile which IMO gives him the advantage.