Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Should the fight have been called a no contest?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 178

Thread: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    908
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1223
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Yeh the fight should have been called a no contest.
    We all saw that that cut was dripping/POURING blood into Barrera's eye and wether you want to believe it or not that plays a big role in any fight.
    Lifes a wheel of fortune and its my turn to spin it. -Tupac Shakur



    Hidden Content

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1458
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Barrera would of had every reason to of withdrawn himself with a cut so bad so early into the fight but being the man he is he chose to fight on and take his lumps just to keep everyone happy.

    Make no qualms that khan was the better man on the night and pretty sure with or without the cut fighting like that would of eventually stopped barrera at some point.

    But still you cant help but think khan won by default
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    300
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    869
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    There are good stoppages,and BS stoppages,that would have been a good stoppage,the guy was fighting with one eye in there.He had a Tom Savini special effect over his eye.
    Nothing but respect for him being a warrior and wanting to go on,but the blood was going directly in to his eye

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3381
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    It annoys me how little credit Khan is getting in the light of this though.

    The cut was bad but plenty of fighters have been cut or injured worse than that and still fought on and won.

    Look at the hell Vargas gave Mosely with only one eye, how Sergio Mora rallied against Peter Manfredo after suffering a horrific cut early, how Arthur Abraham beat Edison Miranda with his jaw hanging off of his face. Danny Williams beating Mark Potter with a dislocated shoulder.

    Barrera got DOMINATED from the very first bell.

    You can argue that a prime Barrera kills Khan, that a Barrera fighting in his proper weight class kills Khan but its an inescapable fact that a 35 year Barrera after 70 fights, fighting at lightweight against a younger, faster, stronger man gets DOMINATED.

    Sad, but true.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,816
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    I voted yes. Regardless of Barrera's willingness to fight on till the 5th round, it's the ref's job and the doctor's job (and probably even the corner's job) to know when the fight should not continue. The blood was constantly pouring into MAB's eye, and clearly affecting the fight, regardless of what MAB's corner was doing to try to stop the bleeding. Yes, it should've been a NC.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    It annoys me how little credit Khan is getting in the light of this though.

    The cut was bad but plenty of fighters have been cut or injured worse than that and still fought on and won.

    Look at the hell Vargas gave Mosely with only one eye, how Sergio Mora rallied against Peter Manfredo after suffering a horrific cut early, how Arthur Abraham beat Edison Miranda with his jaw hanging off of his face. Danny Williams beating Mark Potter with a dislocated shoulder.

    Barrera got DOMINATED from the very first bell.

    You can argue that a prime Barrera kills Khan, that a Barrera fighting in his proper weight class kills Khan but its an inescapable fact that a 35 year Barrera after 70 fights, fighting at lightweight against a younger, faster, stronger man gets DOMINATED.

    Sad, but true.
    That cut was terrible and definitely ruined the fight. It's not the actual injury that's the problem.. it's the blood pissing into his eye blinding him. Just check how many times he was wiping the blood from his eye, that is a huge concentration killer.

    Khan was never gonna get credit from the "hardcores"
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    This Lunatic Asylum
    Posts
    23,278
    Mentioned
    428 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3132
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    All this no-contest stuff is bollocks.

    All those crying about it wouldn't be had Barrera knocked him spark-out.. I bet you all would have been praising the ref/doc/corner for letting it carry on
    3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Tropical Paradise
    Posts
    26,816
    Mentioned
    536 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2036
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    How does saying it should've been a NC equate to being anti-Khan? Khan was doing a GREAT job. But unfortunately, there was a clash of heads that caused a huge gash that was pumping out blood and affecting Barrera's ability to fight normally. This is no knock on Khan. Get a grip, Khanites. Khan's good and will continue to rise. (He's a bit chinny, so he has to be careful of that). But boxing is unpredictable, and unfortunately for all, the clash of heads changed everything.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1717
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    All this no-contest stuff is bollocks.

    All those crying about it wouldn't be had Barrera knocked him spark-out.. I bet you all would have been praising the ref/doc/corner for letting it carry on
    Exactly what I thought, if Khan got caught with the headbutt and had got a NC, people would no doubt been calling him a fag/pussy/biitch for not fighting on. If he had and had lost people would've just said, 'he had his chance to quit'.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1356
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    if the doctor would have stopped it by the 3rd which i think he should have well yes, but Barrera and his corner elected to go on, so their own fault that it ended up a TD5 for Khan, kinda reminds me of Tyson/Williams, Mike basically had Danny Williams out of there until he hurt his knee, should have spoken up and left it a NC but well that's how shit goes

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    84
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    934
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    maybe,you`re missing the point,what I mean is,if Barrera decided he did`nt want to fight on BEFORE the fourth it would have been ruled A TKO loss for him,so,...sure he did`nt want to quit,...Anywat it does`nt really matter if Barrera wanted to quit or not,with A cut like that NO fighter can be expected to fight up to his value,it looked to me that Khan was gonna dominate the fight,He`s flat out to big and strong and young for Barrera at this point,that`s why IMO A big deal should not be made of it,even if the cut never occured.At this point like Warren said Khan should be able to beat Barrera at this point.All of Barrera`s Exp. is more of A detrament than A asset at this point.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1356
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by TeleTuff View Post
    maybe,you`re missing the point,what I mean is,if Barrera decided he did`nt want to fight on BEFORE the fourth it would have been ruled A TKO loss for him,so,...sure he did`nt want to quit,...Anywat it does`nt really matter if Barrera wanted to quit or not,with A cut like that NO fighter can be expected to fight up to his value,it looked to me that Khan was gonna dominate the fight,He`s flat out to big and strong and young for Barrera at this point,that`s why IMO A big deal should not be made of it,even if the cut never occured.At this point like Warren said Khan should be able to beat Barrera at this point.All of Barrera`s Exp. is more of A detrament than A asset at this point.
    no it wouldn't have been ruled a TKO loss for him, it would have simply been ruled a NO CONTEST, the cut came from an accidental headbutt not a punch, same as the Robert Guerrero fight last week, Barrera has one more loss on his record cause of his pride, and suprisingly enough i admire his and respect him a lot more because of it, he decided to fight on, even though he was given a justified scapegoat

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3381
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleTuff View Post
    maybe,you`re missing the point,what I mean is,if Barrera decided he did`nt want to fight on BEFORE the fourth it would have been ruled A TKO loss for him,so,...sure he did`nt want to quit,...Anywat it does`nt really matter if Barrera wanted to quit or not,with A cut like that NO fighter can be expected to fight up to his value,it looked to me that Khan was gonna dominate the fight,He`s flat out to big and strong and young for Barrera at this point,that`s why IMO A big deal should not be made of it,even if the cut never occured.At this point like Warren said Khan should be able to beat Barrera at this point.All of Barrera`s Exp. is more of A detrament than A asset at this point.
    no it wouldn't have been ruled a TKO loss for him, it would have simply been ruled a NO CONTEST, the cut came from an accidental headbutt not a punch, same as the Robert Guerrero fight last week, Barrera has one more loss on his record cause of his pride, and suprisingly enough i admire his and respect him a lot more because of it, he decided to fight on, even though he was given a justified scapegoat
    True enough he fought on, but afterwards he moaned about it and tried to backpeddle.

    Not giving Amir any credit whatsoever as well wasn't all that classy.

    He's a legend no doubt but he got completely dominated on Saturday.

    The cut just allows him to save face imo.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    4,528
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1393
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    Quote Originally Posted by Bilbo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TeleTuff View Post
    maybe,you`re missing the point,what I mean is,if Barrera decided he did`nt want to fight on BEFORE the fourth it would have been ruled A TKO loss for him,so,...sure he did`nt want to quit,...Anywat it does`nt really matter if Barrera wanted to quit or not,with A cut like that NO fighter can be expected to fight up to his value,it looked to me that Khan was gonna dominate the fight,He`s flat out to big and strong and young for Barrera at this point,that`s why IMO A big deal should not be made of it,even if the cut never occured.At this point like Warren said Khan should be able to beat Barrera at this point.All of Barrera`s Exp. is more of A detrament than A asset at this point.
    no it wouldn't have been ruled a TKO loss for him, it would have simply been ruled a NO CONTEST, the cut came from an accidental headbutt not a punch, same as the Robert Guerrero fight last week, Barrera has one more loss on his record cause of his pride, and suprisingly enough i admire his and respect him a lot more because of it, he decided to fight on, even though he was given a justified scapegoat
    True enough he fought on, but afterwards he moaned about it and tried to backpeddle.

    Not giving Amir any credit whatsoever as well wasn't all that classy.

    He's a legend no doubt but he got completely dominated on Saturday.

    The cut just allows him to save face imo.
    Bilbo do you think that if Khan was badly heabutted and couldnt see punches coming but Barrera was fine and saw that Khan was there for the taking . Do you think we would have seen a slightly different fight?

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Brack Vegas
    Posts
    1,399
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1127
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Should the Khan/Barrera fight have been called a no contest?

    To be fair Khan would have won this regardless.......and yes the Doctor and the ref should have taken the decision out of MAB's hands and declared this a No-Contest


    Job Biscuit (Shame it wasn't a clear cut win for Khan but there we go)!!!



    eh eh!!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Barrera-Khan Fight Photos
    By :::PSL::: in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 03-18-2009, 02:08 PM
  2. What are betting odds on Barrera/Khan fight?
    By Jody Lane in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 03-15-2009, 01:29 AM
  3. Khan Barrera fight time
    By Mark TKO in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-08-2009, 10:12 PM
  4. Khan v Barrera may become a title fight
    By smashup in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 43
    Last Post: 02-17-2009, 06:52 PM
  5. Khan to contest Commonwealth crown
    By Preme in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-23-2007, 05:45 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing