I thought Holt won it just, because of the knock downs.
I thought Holt won it just, because of the knock downs.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
The guys scoring it for Holt must only pay attention to big shots, its like you zone out and stop watching the fight until you hear the announcer get loud or what? I dont see anyone giving Bradley any credit for getting up from that huge punch. He got up like he was offended to be down on the ground, then wisely took the knee to compose himself. Bradley forced Holt backwards the whole fight, you can say oh Holt didnt throw, or you can say Bradleys activity forced it. Bradley showed some great movement inside that was some Mayweather shit with the upperbody movement. As far as dirty tactics, Holt was crying at the same time holding inside and leading with his head.
Bradley fought well and was effective with the body shots but he was getting out jabbed and Holt handled him in the fight. It was close and the knock downs tipped it in his favour for me.
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
Im really surprised to see so many people have Holt winning or it even being that close. The commentator thought Holt won were people influenced by his opinions? I dont get it at all, even if I was bias towards Holt I cant see how you can give him any more than 5 rounds and that makes it a draw. Bradley outlanded him in almost all the rounds and was applying all of the pressure. Im only glad the judges agreed with me cos anything but a Bradley win would have been a total robbery in my book. I had it 115-111 Bradley.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks