Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

[Killa From Manila]

Prediction of Gareth A. Davies, a formidable boxing sportswriter from UK's Telegraph Media Group:



Beholden to neither boxing camps, Gareth A. Davies brings along with him his invisible crystal ball from the United Kingdom. It reveals to him nothing short of mere speculations. But, he sees from it a see-saw fight between Pound-for-pound King Manny Pacquiao and IBO Light Welterweight Champion Ricky Hatton but conversely predicting an inevitable full stoppage in round 8th or 9th.

Asked about how he sees the fight other than his prediction of a late stoppage by Pacquiao, Davies says “Hatton may dominate Pacquiao in the first three rounds.” But, "Pacquiao will catch him up and through within fourth to fifth rounds and will clinically land more punches until the eight or ninth round," he adds.

Hmm.. interesting. A formidable UK boxing writter picking Pac to win.

[Fatsofatsoman]

you guys make me laugh - the fact that a journalist is even described as formidable then voids all other words past that point - article is then irrelevant.

[XaduBoxer]

you guys make me laugh - the fact that a journalist is even described as formidable then voids all other words past that point - article is then irrelevant.

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

[Fatsofatsoman]

you guys make me laugh - the fact that a journalist is even described as formidable then voids all other words past that point - article is then irrelevant.

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

[XaduBoxer]

you guys make me laugh - the fact that a journalist is even described as formidable then voids all other words past that point - article is then irrelevant.

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

[Fatsofatsoman]

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

I'd say they are just as likely to be wrong as those who picked Pac.

What you wont find is me talking as if Hatton has already won the fight because some people have picked him to. All you Pac fans are treating every bit of pro Pacoganda as if it means the fight is won and that he's scoring points for opinions.

[XaduBoxer]

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

I'd say they are just as likely to be wrong as those who picked Pac.

What you wont find is me talking as if Hatton has already won the fight because some people have picked him to. All you Pac fans are treating every bit of pro Pacoganda as if it means the fight is won and that he's scoring points for opinions.

Fair play... I laughed at one guy here who suggested that Hatton should back out from the fight now...

What I presented in this thread are:

- IMO PAC will probably dish out the worst beating ever on Hatton
- Most people (boxing experts or otherwise) picked PAC to defeat Hatton
- Oddsmakers installed PAC as the 2 to 1 favorite over Hatton

It's all facts (except the first one of course)... and opinions...
.

[DaxxKahn]

Do you think Saddo Boxing forums should apply for a patent on the phrase...Will (Insert name here) inflict the worse beating on (Insert name here)?