Do you think PAC will inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton?

[XaduBoxer]

you guys make me laugh - the fact that a journalist is even described as formidable then voids all other words past that point - article is then irrelevant.

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

[Fatsofatsoman]

What can you say about the 17 less formidable boxing experts who picked Pacquiao over Hatton?

link --> 17 experts pick Manny Pacquiao to defeat Ricky Hatton (The Neutral Corner) - Newsday.com

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

I'd say they are just as likely to be wrong as those who picked Pac.

What you wont find is me talking as if Hatton has already won the fight because some people have picked him to. All you Pac fans are treating every bit of pro Pacoganda as if it means the fight is won and that he's scoring points for opinions.

[XaduBoxer]

I'd probably say that they all picked Lacy to beat Calzaghe or hang on that they all picked ODLH to beat Pac - useless hacks

And what can you say about these 3 boxing experts (3 out of 20, 17 for PAC) who picked Hatton over PAC?

"The three experts who have selected Hatton are Steve Bunch (television commentator) by late-round stoppage; Mark Collings (Esquire UK) mid-to late-round stoppage and Stuart Brennan (Manchester Evening News), possibly late-round stoppage."

I'd say they are just as likely to be wrong as those who picked Pac.

What you wont find is me talking as if Hatton has already won the fight because some people have picked him to. All you Pac fans are treating every bit of pro Pacoganda as if it means the fight is won and that he's scoring points for opinions.

Fair play... I laughed at one guy here who suggested that Hatton should back out from the fight now...

What I presented in this thread are:

- IMO PAC will probably dish out the worst beating ever on Hatton
- Most people (boxing experts or otherwise) picked PAC to defeat Hatton
- Oddsmakers installed PAC as the 2 to 1 favorite over Hatton

It's all facts (except the first one of course)... and opinions...
.

[clintuk]

Isn't it actually all just opinions...and not facts? .... even betting odds are opinions, the fight hasn't happened yet so I don't see how there can be any facts of the outcome! :P

Only fact is that Hatton and Pacquiao are going to fight...and Mayweather Snr. dresses like some over the hill pimp...

[XaduBoxer]

Isn't it actually all just opinions...and not facts? .... even betting odds are opinions, the fight hasn't happened yet so I don't see how there can be any facts of the outcome! :P

Only fact is that Hatton and Pacquiao are going to fight...and Mayweather Snr. dresses like some over the hill pimp...

Facts are:
- Many people pick PAC to defeat Hatton
- PAC is 2 to 1 betting favorite to defeat Hatton

[clintuk]

Isn't it actually all just opinions...and not facts? .... even betting odds are opinions, the fight hasn't happened yet so I don't see how there can be any facts of the outcome! :P

Only fact is that Hatton and Pacquiao are going to fight...and Mayweather Snr. dresses like some over the hill pimp...

Facts are:
- Many people pick PAC to defeat Hatton
- PAC is 2 to 1 betting favorite to defeat Hatton

All I meant is that the many people that pick Pacquiao to win, that's their opinions, and the betting odds have been set by opinions. But I see what you're trying to say, fair enough

I don't think Hatton will be worried about being the underdog at all, for me it's still a tough fight to call no matter how many experts opinions and betting odds are against Ricky.

[Master]

Do you think this thread will ever end.

[XaduBoxer]

Isn't it actually all just opinions...and not facts? .... even betting odds are opinions, the fight hasn't happened yet so I don't see how there can be any facts of the outcome! :P

Only fact is that Hatton and Pacquiao are going to fight...and Mayweather Snr. dresses like some over the hill pimp...

Facts are:
- Many people pick PAC to defeat Hatton
- PAC is 2 to 1 betting favorite to defeat Hatton

All I meant is that the many people that pick Pacquiao to win, that's their opinions, and the betting odds have been set by opinions. But I see what you're trying to say, fair enough

I don't think Hatton will be worried about being the underdog at all, for me it's still a tough fight to call no matter how many experts opinions and betting odds are against Ricky.

Fair enough mate...

I guess Hatton was underdog in the PBF and Tszyu fights. He lost one and won one...

PAC was underdog in Hoya, Morales (2nd fight) and Barrera (1st fight). PAC won all 3 fights when he was the underdog...
.

[DaxxKahn]

Do you think Saddo Boxing forums should apply for a patent on the phrase...Will (Insert name here) inflict the worse beating on (Insert name here)?