I think people are making a big mistake....

[CFH]

People here are fully aware that I and 38 other members of this board pick PAC to inflict the worst beating ever on Hatton...

I just do not understand why so many people are giving Hatton so little credit? This man is undefeated at 140lbs, he has been the divisions King since he beat Tszyu without question....

PAC was the former man at 112, 126 and 130 divisions and this early 2 rankings organizations (FightNews and BoxRec) already recognized PAC as the man at 140 lbs. division ...

..... ..... .....

Why so much doubt in him?
I think people are selling Ricky a bit short...No make that WAAAY to short in this fight....

Yes it's true Hatton's arm length is too short in this fight... Hatton's arm length is only 20 inches compared to 25 inches that of PAC...

A little too much Pacquiao fever not enough using the old noggin when matching up the strengths and weaknesses

Here my advantages/disadvantages analysis:

....................Speed - PAC
......................Skills - PAC
Style (same as skills) - PAC
...................Stance - PAC (southpaw)
..................Stamina - PAC
.......................Chin - PAC (slightly)
.....................Heart - PAC
..............Experience - PAC
....................Reach - PAC
...........Height/Taller - PAC
Quality of Opponents - PAC
.......Ring Generalship - PAC
.........Corner/Trainer - PAC