I think people are making a big mistake....

[XaduBoxer]

U really are stupid arent u. Of course a ref can have a major influence on a fight, just as officials in any sport can.
Hattons main advantage over Pac is his superior inside fighting and possibly strength. If the ref makes it hard for Hatton to do this then he is in trouble. If the ref lets Hatton grapple and push etc a lot then he has a much greater chance of victory. If it was only ever the fighters themselves who determined the victory then why is there ever any discussion on things like the size of the ring, type of gloves, who the ref is, where the fight is held etc etc etc? Lots of variables come into play when to good fighters are up against each other.

Sometimes refs screw some fights and had a major influence in the fight outcome but IMO, in this fight the ref won't matter that much... That's my own "stupid" personal opinion tho... (according to you)...
.

So u already know how the ref is going to officiate the fight before it happens?

Whatever way the ref will officiate this fight, it won't matter much coz I highly think this fight will end in a KO... That's my "stupid" opinion tho...
.

[eagle]

Sometimes refs screw some fights and had a major influence in the fight outcome but IMO, in this fight the ref won't matter that much... That's my own "stupid" personal opinion tho... (according to you)...
.

So u already know how the ref is going to officiate the fight before it happens?

Whatever way the ref will officiate this fight, it won't matter much coz I highly think this fight will end in a KO... That's my "stupid" opinion tho...
.

That makes no sense at all! It is beyond stupid. So if the ref is biased towards one fighter it wont change the outcome? Fuck me u know nothing about boxing.

[XaduBoxer]

So u already know how the ref is going to officiate the fight before it happens?

Whatever way the ref will officiate this fight, it won't matter much coz I highly think this fight will end in a KO... That's my "stupid" opinion tho...
.

That makes no sense at all! It is beyond stupid. So if the ref is biased towards one fighter it wont change the outcome? Fuck me u know nothing about boxing.

Be careful what you wish for... but I have to think about it...

Got to go Madam, I will answer you next login...
.

[Andre]

This childish crap this has once again turned into, isnt for the main board.
You guys want to make this place look like a little kids shit fight you will get the boot.

[CFH]

Well, this was a decent thread before it got derailed by the usual bullshit.

[Andre]

There are two sides to this ,one is the provoker who knows dam well what he is doing, yet stays within the rules.
The others attack him over it.
I sense a decision is closing on in fast.

[XaduBoxer]

Well, this was a decent thread before it got derailed by the usual bullshit.

Count me out... I didn't do any bullshitting on this thread... I'm just presenting facts and opinions...
.

[fan johnny]

Sometimes refs screw some fights and had a major influence in the fight outcome but IMO, in this fight the ref won't matter that much... That's my own "stupid" personal opinion tho... (according to you)...
.

So u already know how the ref is going to officiate the fight before it happens?

Whatever way the ref will officiate this fight, it won't matter much coz I highly think this fight will end in a KO... That's my "stupid" opinion tho...
.

Although I hate saying it, Eagle actually has a valid point. Hatton's strength is on inside, if the ref is one that doesn't allow the clinches it takes Hatton's best weapon away.