Capitalism

[VictorCharlie]

I agree we would be better with no nukes, but is that a plausible reality?

[Gandalf]

I agree we would be better with no nukes, but is that a plausible reality?

No, not now, unfortunately. Which is why I think it's hypocritical of nations with nukes to try and dictate to nations who want to procure or develop nukes. There is no moral argument as far as I can see. If you have a deterrent then I should be able to have the same.

[VictorCharlie]

I don't think North Korea has any intention of using nukes on any one regardless of their rhetoric. That being said it is a very unstable nation. There are a myriad of scenarios where a NKR nuke could be used by a terrorist org or be used preemptively. I agree with Kirk in that I think their ability to build such a weapon are greatly exaggerated but not the ominous possibilities if it were true.

[Gandalf]

I don't think North Korea has any intention of using nukes on any one regardless of their rhetoric. That being said it is a very unstable nation. There are a myriad of scenarios where a NKR nuke could be used by a terrorist org or be used preemptively. I agree with Kirk in that I think their ability to build such a weapon are greatly exaggerated but not the ominous possibilities if it were true.

North Korea is a despicable state, but one that just wants to survive. Gaining access to nuclear weapons is just another means of self preservation. I agree with the both of you that the rhetoric is probably far more than what has actually been devloped in North Korea.

I would prefer North Korea to remain nuclear free, but could not argue a moral case againt them having the right to develop such an arsenal.