Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
I know Floyd was a smaller man than Oscar throughout most of his career but I think your missing my point. He obviously wouldnt have fought Tito in 1999 or whenever Oscar fought him at Welter, but since most people agree that Floyd wasnt past his prime when he did fight at Welter, match them prime for prime. Or a prime Floyd at 135 against the guys Oscar fought at lightweight. Its all hypothetical, but any way you look at it Floyd would not be undefeated imo. If Oscar fought Floyds competition, in form, hypothetically, I wouldnt be surprised if he was undefeated either.
I think it's a bit much to say 'any way you look at it Floyd would not be undefeated'. I personally think Floyd could have outpointed Trinidad, by outboxing him similar to Hopkins did. Am I convinced that if Oscar faced the same height & reach disadvantages that Floyd did against Corrales, that he would have beaten him, no I'm not. But, its all hypothetical. If someone feels that Oscar has the better legacy fair enough, but when you start doing hypothetical fights it becomes hard to compare.

Also tbh, I think if you only look at fights below 147, apart from JCC who was old, I think Floyd has a significantly better legacy. Most of the great names on Oscar's resume come at 147 & above. Don't get me wrong, Oscar has a great legacy & he gets a really hard time from posters on here, but the fact is you can't pick and choose what to take into account in one form and not in the other (ie the Castillo/Quartey decisions).