Pac v Morales or Barrera - in their primes

[miron_lang]

Very harsh on Pac considering he beat them 4 out of 5 times.

I tend to agree though. The first Morales fight was a truer reflection of how they compare than the all of a sudden shot Morales of the rematch.

And Barrera showed enough second time to suggest, in his pomp, with a better preparation, the first Pac fight may well have been different.

Exactly . If thats what a washed up Barrera can do . Imagine if Barrera was in his prime

Just IMAGINE how would people rank a prime Barrera if a washed up version was pound for pound number 3 . The sad thing is that's all we can do. IMAGINE

[Gandalf]

Another old thread and I even posted on it. What's going on?

I have revised my opinion. Barrera and Morales could knock out all nughuggers in one round.

[zhubin]

It's a tricky question. Morales won the first Pac fight and he was just probabaly getting past his peak around that time. The second and third fights, Eric was clearly shot...and Pac was hungry. The first Barrera fight is hard to judge for me. Marco definitely had outside distraction...PLUS...i don't think him or anyone else was ready for Pac to explode onto the scene like that. Their second fight...well...Barrera was nowhere near his prime and was gunshy. I would say Marco would have the better chance in his prime because Marco was a cerebral fighter on top of being a brawler. Eric was technically a great fighter...but his pride always got the best of him.

[miron_lang]

Another old thread and I even posted on it. What's going on?

I have revised my opinion. Barrera and Morales could knock out all nughuggers in one round.

Can you tell me the purpose of the 5 related threads at bottom of each current thread?

I havent read some of them so i went in and read. is it forbidden to reply to it?

[Gandalf]

Another old thread and I even posted on it. What's going on?

I have revised my opinion. Barrera and Morales could knock out all nughuggers in one round.

Can you tell me the purpose of the 5 related threads at bottom of each current thread?

I havent read some of them so i went in and read. is it forbidden to reply to it?

Oh come on now.

I wasn't being serious. I haven't been serious on a number of my recent posts. Just surprised to read through a thread and saw I posted a long time ago that's all....

[miron_lang]

Another old thread and I even posted on it. What's going on?

I have revised my opinion. Barrera and Morales could knock out all nughuggers in one round.

Can you tell me the purpose of the 5 related threads at bottom of each current thread?

I havent read some of them so i went in and read. is it forbidden to reply to it?

Oh come on now.

I wasn't being serious. I haven't been serious on a number of my recent posts. Just surprised to read through a thread and saw I posted a long time ago that's all....

sure mate

i wasnt being serious either

Just making up for lost time. havent been here for years. i guess saddo should take out that feature wherein 5 related threads are displayed no matter how old.

[Gandalf]

Can you tell me the purpose of the 5 related threads at bottom of each current thread?

I havent read some of them so i went in and read. is it forbidden to reply to it?

Oh come on now.

I wasn't being serious. I haven't been serious on a number of my recent posts. Just surprised to read through a thread and saw I posted a long time ago that's all....

sure mate

i wasnt being serious either

Just making up for lost time. havent been here for years. i guess saddo should take out that feature wherein 5 related threads are displayed no matter how old.

No, it's a good feature. It should be used periodically to confuse people like me!