Boxers fight for MONEY not glory. Fact.

[RP33]

Boxing is all about marketability.. if you take a lower payday than what you may be able to get, it most likely is with the intent to set up a bigger payday in the future..

Let's face it, in boxing if you're undefeated you're always marketable, but the more losses you have that marketability starts to fade, with the exception of some elite fighters.. With undefeated fighters there is always that excitement factor of, "will he be the first one to beat him?!" which gains interest from a lot of casual fans.

Although, i wouldn't say that they don't fight for glory. Boxers are as competetive as any other sportsman. But, i would say that money comes first, then glory.. but there is plenty of glory.

[Fenster]

Marquez fought John for $30,000 after a 2nd Pac fight fell through. It wasn't a fight to enhance his legacy though, they probably thought John was an easy fight. And all it really highlights is Nacho Beristain is a crap manager.

Booze, I think it was just a case of negotiations breaking down with Oscar, so the fight was scrapped. So probably just Mosley playing the game badly.

RP33, I agree the glory is there, but it's second to the money. The money comes before glory, although it's not portrayed like that.

[boozeboxer]

Marquez fought John for $30,000 after a 2nd Pac fight fell through. It wasn't a fight to enhance his legacy though, they probably thought John was an easy fight. And all it really highlights is Nacho Beristain is a crap manager.

Booze, I think it was just a case of negotiations breaking down with Oscar, so the fight was scrapped. So probably just Mosley playing the game badly.

RP33, I agree the glory is there, but it's second to the money. The money comes before glory, although it's not portrayed like that.

Can we all agree that fighting Chris John at his home for $30,000 is the dumbest fight ever made?

[Lance Uppercut]

You cant pay your mortgage with glory.

[Bethnal Green]

obviously moneys important, but for boxers who are not at the absolute height of the sport the money is not all that great- often leading to many boxers even at national level, still having a day job, making the glory a key reason for fighting. Furthermore, there is no money for being recognised as the p4p king yet every fighter would love this honour. I don't know of any fighter who would not want to secure their legacy. Money has taken a larger role due to promoters etc. I think real boxers want glory and legacy just as much as money. Another part of the money issue is generally the champion or fighter recognised as the best secures the highest proportion of the purse, so you can say that the money is a status thing- more money= better reputation as a fighter.

[Julius Rain]

I much did past fighters make? surely not as much as fighters now because the past fighters fought more often.

Can anybody make a decade by decade salary list for fighters beginning in the early 1900s. Im curious to know how guys like Jack Johnson made, or Jake Lamotta.

[Master]

Lennox took the lesser purse against Holyfield to unify the titles and get the glory and there by making more money.

[Fenster]

obviously moneys important, but for boxers who are not at the absolute height of the sport the money is not all that great- often leading to many boxers even at national level, still having a day job, making the glory a key reason for fighting. Furthermore, there is no money for being recognised as the p4p king yet every fighter would love this honour. I don't know of any fighter who would not want to secure their legacy. Money has taken a larger role due to promoters etc. I think real boxers want glory and legacy just as much as money. Another part of the money issue is generally the champion or fighter recognised as the best secures the highest proportion of the purse, so you can say that the money is a status thing- more money= better reputation as a fighter.

Not sure about that. In fact, the money is more important for lower tier fighters. Would they have a job if they could earn enough as a full-time fighter? Don't think so. And they still get paid. I'm sure many love the game but they wouldn't fight for free, right? (well maybe a few nutters would )

[XaduBoxer]

Marquez fought John for $30,000 after a 2nd Pac fight fell through. It wasn't a fight to enhance his legacy though, they probably thought John was an easy fight. And all it really highlights is Nacho Beristain is a crap manager.

When JMM opted to exchange a $750,000 purse with a $30,000 purse (and a loss), I think that time he was trying to regain his lost glory/legacy... That time, IBF just recently stripped JMM of his featherweight title for failing to have a mandatory fight since no promoter willing to spend a minimum $50,000 purse bid in JMM's mandatory defense (you know JMM's style is boring)... JMM losing his IBF title resulted to WBA withdrawing his "super champion" status... JMM ended without any titles/belts then he's demoted as the mandatory challenger to Chris John's regular WBA featherweight title... JMM tried to regain his legacy/title but failed during that time... It was the lowest point in JMM's career...

But props for JMM for fighting for glory... It's seldom seen in a professional boxer since being a professional boxer, you're expected to choose money over glory anytime...
.

[Spicoli]

Realistically,yeah guys want and deserve to get payed in worth but I dont think its all about money for all of them,they are not all that transparent.Ego,pride come into the equation more often than not for many fighters.Alot of older guys hang on trying to recapture the glory of days gone by,chasing shadows and wanting to 'prove' that they still have it....and far to often the non stars and ones that blew it all have to stick around for the bucks alone.

[blegit]

Well, as a fan I don't like it when the right fights don't get made because of the money route. But as a former boxer I override this dislike because boxing is a temporary job and a sport with bad intentions. It can all be over in a millisecond. So I never get down on a boxer thinking more about the money than the legacy because they have families and bills to take care of and no amount of legacy raises children. Boxers are used like higher priced goons and so it is an intelligent business decision for them to take the most money route everytime. Promoters and networks should take a paycut if they want to please the fans. Don't blame the two guys who are being offered to kill each other. Make them an offer they can't refuse.

[CGM]

Maybe, maybe not. in one sense it's about money, in another sense it's not. You could argue that for some money is a yardstick by which glory is measured. And you'll never see a top fighter do it for free, but...

A guy like deLahoya really isn't in it purely for the money these last few years. He's got more money than he'll ever be able to spend. He loves the action.

Top pro athletes, whether they be into boxing, basketball, golf, whatever, arguably have a moral obligation to go for as much money as possible. You raise the bar for the top dogs, and you raise the bar for everyone else down the line. You see a ball player take a lesser contract than he can get, and he will be scorned by the other guys in the league.

case in point. In pro Golf, Joe Average is a lot better off financially when you have a superstar like Woods winning all the tournaments and making a ton of dough.

[Fenster]

Well, as a fan I don't like it when the right fights don't get made because of the money route. But as a former boxer I override this dislike because boxing is a temporary job and a sport with bad intentions. It can all be over in a millisecond. So I never get down on a boxer thinking more about the money than the legacy because they have families and bills to take care of and no amount of legacy raises children. Boxers are used like higher priced goons and so it is an intelligent business decision for them to take the most money route everytime. Promoters and networks should take a paycut if they want to please the fans. Don't blame the two guys who are being offered to kill each other. Make them an offer they can't refuse

I agree. I think the majority of boxing fans view the sport through rose-tinted glasses.

"Show me the man who says he ain't fighting for money, and I'll show you a fool." Larry Holmes

"When you're fighting, you're fighting for one thing - money." Jack Dempsey

"Fighters want to fight for titles, but not as much as we want to fight for MONEY." Roy Jones jr

[JazMerkin]

Well, as a fan I don't like it when the right fights don't get made because of the money route. But as a former boxer I override this dislike because boxing is a temporary job and a sport with bad intentions. It can all be over in a millisecond. So I never get down on a boxer thinking more about the money than the legacy because they have families and bills to take care of and no amount of legacy raises children. Boxers are used like higher priced goons and so it is an intelligent business decision for them to take the most money route everytime. Promoters and networks should take a paycut if they want to please the fans. Don't blame the two guys who are being offered to kill each other. Make them an offer they can't refuse

I agree. I think the majority of boxing fans view the sport through rose-tinted glasses.

"Show me the man who says he ain't fighting for money, and I'll show you a fool." Larry Holmes

"When you're fighting, you're righting for one thing - money." Jack Dempsey

"Fighters want to fight for titles, but not as much as we want to fight for MONEY." Roy Jones jr

Exactly, and who can blame them, they get hit in the face by some of the toughest punchers on the planet (relatively speaking even guys who aren't big punchers in the sport would be if they were Joe average on the street). I don't think Ali & Oscar were good examples. Ali was not as wealthy as people think when he was fighting Holmes & Berbick, its only since the 90s and the more mainstream love for Ali that he has got richer. Oscar was only fighting in fights where he was getting the majority of the cash & if they were superfights. If it wasn't about the money he wouldn't have cared if the PBF & Pac fights were split 50-50. Agree with blegit. The TV networks & promoters who don't cough up the extra dough are the ones I blame if a 'fans fight' doesn't happen.

[Rantcatrat]

I usually am reluctant to give the guy credit, but Froch came to the US to fight Taylor, and although I'm sure he was paid handsomely to do so, he took a risk he didn't have to take. He could easily have stayed in Nottingham fighting nobodies and making the same amount of money. He did it without any british tv exposure either.