The Mayweather double standard.

[JonesJrMayweather]

you named 3 fighters way above everyone else on pacs resume and you still think floyd has a better resume. so who on floyds resume is better than mab,em,jmm?

and answer my other question, so is floyd a natural lightweight not a natural welterweight? so shouldn't he fight jmm at 135 then? since jmm is lightweight king. or atleast fight jmm at 140.

floyd is a natural pussy who severly selected his oppenent. im sure if jmm was a welterweight he'd want no piece of him. jmm is a better version of castillo who gave floyd trouble.

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

[skel1983]

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

Pacman would destroy Chico, i love Chicco but Pac is far to skilled for Corrales

[JonesJrMayweather]

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

Pacman would destroy Chico, i love Chicco but Pac is far to skilled for Corrales

NOW he is...back then when before chico fought castillo, pacman wasn't as sound as he is now. that's why he couldn't finish JMM after three knockdowns...

[ElTerribleMorales]

3 names on Pacquiao's resume that are better then anyone Mayweather fought?

Sure they are "names" but lets take a closer look at it floyd hater

He only beat Morales after Erik moved back down in weight and had already lost to Zahir Raheem. If Pacquiao was the warrior you make him out to be that fought everyone he would have fought Raheem but he fought a second match with an obviously faded Morales for the money and you can make the argument that Erik was past his prime and that the Raheem fight showed that. And there is a lot of people who feel Pacquiao lost both fights against Marquez and he barely won the second one, by one round because of the knockdown.


But on Mayweathers resume, everyone on that list with the exception of the first Castillo fight, Mayweather dominated them. But Pacquiao only dominated one and that was Barerra and it can be said he only beat Morales after Morales was past his prime and also that he didn't beat Marquez or barely squeaked by. So defend that

There may be the three "names" on Pacquiao's resume but he only dominated one in their prime. all the names on Mayweather's list he dominated with the exception of the first Castillo fight and even then he came back and won the rematch with ease. Pacquiao on the other hand after "improving" only barely beat Marquez because of the knockdown and there is a lot of argument to say that he lost that rematch too. Meanwhile there is no one on Mayweathers resume with the exception of the first Castillo fight that you could find anyone that says that Mayweather could have lost

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

that's the biggest load of crap i've ever heard, Morales wasn't one dimesional by any means, he showed various times that he could both slug and box, all you have to see is the 11th round to know that if Morales still had something left he would have stopped Raheem in the earlier rounds, the only round Morales actually attacked and knocks Raheem down, cleanly, and it was ruled a slip , and the fact that 4 of his losses came back to back, pretty much shows that it's due to the decline of his abilities, don't know what fights you've been watching to actually try to dub Morales a one dimensional fighter

[JonesJrMayweather]

Only beat him because of a knockdown? Thats the goofiest thing i've ever heard! "Thats like saying he only reason he one was because he punched him in the face more!" Yes it was a close fight and yea knockdowns due tend to give you an advantage duh! Even though Pacquiao is in his prime now, he would easily have taken care of Castillio and Corrales a few years ago with no problems!

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

that's the biggest load of crap i've ever heard, Morales wasn't one dimesional by any means, he showed various times that he could both slug and box, all you have to see is the 11th round to know that if Morales still had something left he would have stopped Raheem in the earlier rounds, the only round Morales actually attacked and knocks Raheem down, cleanly, and it was ruled a slip , and the fact that 4 of his losses came back to back, pretty much shows that it's due to the decline of his abilities, don't know what fights you've been watching to actually try to dub Morales a one dimensional fighter

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

[Julius Rain]

First, morrales was not fading, Raheem would have beaten Morrales at any stage of his career. Perhaps it was the onesided schooling he took from raheem that broke his confidence and exposed him as a one dimensional fighter.


Secondly, beat corrales with ease? PACMAN? nah i doubt that at the time when corrales was fighting and could possibly face pacman, pacman didnt have the skills to beat corrales and probably would have been stopped.

that's the biggest load of crap i've ever heard, Morales wasn't one dimesional by any means, he showed various times that he could both slug and box, all you have to see is the 11th round to know that if Morales still had something left he would have stopped Raheem in the earlier rounds, the only round Morales actually attacked and knocks Raheem down, cleanly, and it was ruled a slip , and the fact that 4 of his losses came back to back, pretty much shows that it's due to the decline of his abilities, don't know what fights you've been watching to actually try to dub Morales a one dimensional fighter

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

[levi#1BoxingFan]

Elterrible im not sure what goes through your mind on a daily basis, im guessing its kinda like when you've got bunny ears on an old T.V. and your trying to get a signal but theres nothing but snow! Obviously you didnt read my response little boy so I'm going to repeat myself. I never denied that the Pacquiao vs. JMM fights wern't close, because they were! I'm talking about the comment "the only reason he won was because of the knockdown". Thats jibberish, yea knockdowns are a part of boxing and JMM couldnt stay on his feet and it caused him to lose, no freakin duh Elterrible, so do yourself a favor and try to get a signal! And why is it that everyone talks about Pacquiao almost losing to JMM (a great fighter) when Mayweather CLEARLY lost to Castillio (a good but not great fighter)?

[JonesJrMayweather]

that's the biggest load of crap i've ever heard, Morales wasn't one dimesional by any means, he showed various times that he could both slug and box, all you have to see is the 11th round to know that if Morales still had something left he would have stopped Raheem in the earlier rounds, the only round Morales actually attacked and knocks Raheem down, cleanly, and it was ruled a slip , and the fact that 4 of his losses came back to back, pretty much shows that it's due to the decline of his abilities, don't know what fights you've been watching to actually try to dub Morales a one dimensional fighter

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

uh yeah and he's also the only one that was beaten into submission twice by pacman since thats what you use to gauge his ability against MAB and JMM. Even the clearly past it MAB managed a decision.

[ElTerribleMorales]

that's the biggest load of crap i've ever heard, Morales wasn't one dimesional by any means, he showed various times that he could both slug and box, all you have to see is the 11th round to know that if Morales still had something left he would have stopped Raheem in the earlier rounds, the only round Morales actually attacked and knocks Raheem down, cleanly, and it was ruled a slip , and the fact that 4 of his losses came back to back, pretty much shows that it's due to the decline of his abilities, don't know what fights you've been watching to actually try to dub Morales a one dimensional fighter

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

not to mention many believe that Morales won the second fight, which was the most TECHNICAL fight of the 3

Elterrible im not sure what goes through your mind on a daily basis, im guessing its kinda like when you've got bunny ears on an old T.V. and your trying to get a signal but theres nothing but snow! Obviously you didnt read my response little boy so I'm going to repeat myself. I never denied that the Pacquiao vs. JMM fights wern't close, because they were! I'm talking about the comment "the only reason he won was because of the knockdown". Thats jibberish, yea knockdowns are a part of boxing and JMM couldnt stay on his feet and it caused him to lose, no freakin duh Elterrible, so do yourself a favor and try to get a signal! And why is it that everyone talks about Pacquiao almost losing to JMM (a great fighter) when Mayweather CLEARLY lost to Castillio (a good but not great fighter)?

first off don't call me little boy cause unlike you i'm no kid, it's no jibberish because even a flash knockdown would have done it, don't kid yourself thinking that Manny was anywhere close in stopping JMM, the thing you don't understand is that Pacquiao ONLY won due to the knockdown, cause if it weren't for that, there is NO way anyone would have been able to have him ahead of JMM

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

uh yeah and he's also the only one that was beaten into submission twice by pacman since thats what you use to gauge his ability against MAB and JMM. Even the clearly past it MAB managed a decision.

well then going by your way of thinking, Jones Jr must of been pretty one dimensional as well, cause the first time he stepped in the ring against a hard hitting fast southpaw in Tarver he barely got a MD, then got KTFO in 2, with only one shot, brutally KO'd in his next fight against Johnson, and then barely managed to make it out of the 11th to lose by UD against Tarver funny how that "logic" works out

[JonesJrMayweather]

None of what you said changes the fact that morrales had never faced a school slick boxer like raheem, and he got schooled handedly...he couldn't adapt and kept waving his hands for raheem to engage. Then after the fight said one the dumbest things a fighter can say

"he didnt want to fight, he just kept hitting me and moving away"

Morralles was one dimensional...that's why he lost twice to MAB i think three times ,twice to PAC, and schooled by Raheem...moralle was highly overrated IMO good, but no way on the same level as MAB and JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

not to mention many believe that Morales won the second fight, which was the most TECHNICAL fight of the 3
first off don't call me little boy cause unlike you i'm no kid, it's no jibberish because even a flash knockdown would have done it, don't kid yourself thinking that Manny was anywhere close in stopping JMM, the thing you don't understand is that Pacquiao ONLY won due to the knockdown, cause if it weren't for that, there is NO way anyone would have been able to have him ahead of JMM

uh but eric is the only 1 who actually won over pac, marco never came close and jmm always comes up short. I dont think his one demensional thats a big harsh

uh yeah and he's also the only one that was beaten into submission twice by pacman since thats what you use to gauge his ability against MAB and JMM. Even the clearly past it MAB managed a decision.

well then going by your way of thinking, Jones Jr must of been pretty one dimensional as well, cause the first time he stepped in the ring against a hard hitting fast southpaw in Tarver he barely got a MD, then got KTFO in 2, with only one shot, brutally KO'd in his next fight against Johnson, and then barely managed to make it out of the 11th to lose by UD against Tarver funny how that "logic" works out

That's your logic not mine, dude i think you should have someone read aloud to you, because it seems that you're processing the information wrong...you used erik's one victory over pacman as leverage to him being better than JMM and MAB, and the fact that he was able to slug with pacquiao instead of box. It's your logic that he's not one dimensional based off what he did against an underschooled pacman, once roach was able to get manny to wait and counter a little bit, morrales was done. An d they learned that after watching raheem beat the hell out of him, only difference was Zahir didnt hit as hard as Manny.

Now just to entertain the silly comments about roy...only an idiot would argue that jones was one dimensional.

BTW don't take it personal, im sure erik morrales doesn't pay you to be his internet guardian