Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Smile Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Big Wlad has had his time to put the heavweight division back on the map.He failed terribly.
    Now its Hayes turn to light up the heavweights!

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Question should be if Haye is going to need Boxings help to pay his medical bills. I say yes.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Cool Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.
    Violent - do you honestly think i give a toss about points?
    I just post my opinions and people can agree or disagree.
    I have come across you on some of the other forums I post on and imo you are just a 'blinkered hater' where as I am a boxing fan

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Quote Originally Posted by pacman79 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.
    Violent - do you honestly think i give a toss about points?
    I just post my opinions and people can agree or disagree.
    I have come across you on some of the other forums I post on and imo you are just a 'blinkered hater' where as I am a boxing fan
    Your not a fan. Your another Pac groupie. There's a difference.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacman79 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.
    Violent - do you honestly think i give a toss about points?
    I just post my opinions and people can agree or disagree.
    I have come across you on some of the other forums I post on and imo you are just a 'blinkered hater' where as I am a boxing fan
    Your not a fan. Your another Pac groupie. There's a difference.
    Dude, he's said nothing pro Pacquiao and he's made 6 posts for fucks sake. His thread is basically asking if Haye is distasteful and bad for boxing, or if what he's doing is good for boxing. So why bad rep him for bringing up a topic that people are discussing right now?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2106
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    I think the world wide community probably doesn't, but I think the UK needs him.

    No Calzaghe. No Hatton. Who is gonna fill those shoes? Witter? Kahn? Andy Lee? Froch?

    I just think he is good for the country he lives in. At least for now.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacman79 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.
    Violent - do you honestly think i give a toss about points?
    I just post my opinions and people can agree or disagree.
    I have come across you on some of the other forums I post on and imo you are just a 'blinkered hater' where as I am a boxing fan
    Your not a fan. Your another Pac groupie. There's a difference.
    I do a post on David Haye so I'm a Pac groupie?

    I am a Pac fan,haye fan,Mayweather fan.I like Hayes/Pacmans all action,attacking style and prefer it to Mayweathers defensive style.However I do admire his ability.It's just personal taste.
    Some people like Hagler,some liked Leonard.
    In fact I think mayweather beat a far better version of Oscar Than Manny did and I also think Mayweather took Hattons punch resistance.I think Floyd would beat Manny at 147.
    I am a boxing fan without the blinkers that alot of you haters have.
    I look at the facts and post my opinions based on facts.
    Not on some blinkered ideas because of love or hate for one fighter.

    So whos the groupie now?

    Anyway back on topic.
    I think haye ko's Wlad inside 5

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    'I went with 'Yes', but not necessarily in terms of Haye per se... More what he represents - Boxers who are willing to take risks and promote the sport'

    This is exactly the point I am trying to make.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    163
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    848
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Does Boxing Need The Hayemaker?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Saying yes is pretty much saying Boxing can't survive without Haye. That is clearly not the case.
    As I explained too you before.
    You would want to be a mad man to think boxing wouldn't survive without Haye.
    However the heavyweight division has been in a dire state over the last few years.A fighter like David Haye is putting the excitement and mainstream interest back into boxings marquis division.This can only be good for boxing.I'm sure boxing fans agree.
    Last edited by pacman79; 05-18-2009 at 10:42 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing