Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 85

Thread: Arum: "Even a 50/50 split with Floyd and Pac is utter nonsense".

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: Arum: "Even a 50/50 split with Floyd and Pac is utter nonsense".

    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    PAC is the hottest boxer right now... He should get the lion's share even out of respect for his current status in boxing...
    That's not how it works.

    When Floyd fought Oscar, he was everyone's #1 PFP, yet he took way less than a 50/50 split, because Oscar was the one who brought more money to the promotion.

    It's about who brings more money to the table. When Floyd and Pac sit down to negotiate, Floyd is going to point out that Floyd-Oscar did more PPV buys than Pac-Oscar, Floyd-Hatton did more PPV buys than Pac-Hatton, and Floyd-Marquez will likely do more buys than either Pac-Marquez fight. There's no reason for Floyd to take less than 50/50 against Pac.
    Team PAC can always counter PBF's higher PPV numbers by saying that PAC's fights with Hoya and Hatton were during difficult times where there's a current global economic crisis...

    Also I think PBF got a lesser purse split percentage wise in the Hoya fight as compared to the reported 38% that PAC got from Hoya... I don't know the purse split in PBF-Hatton fight...
    .

  2. #2
    USAalltheway Guest

    Default Re: Arum: "Even a 50/50 split with Floyd and Pac is utter nonsense".

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    PAC is the hottest boxer right now... He should get the lion's share even out of respect for his current status in boxing...
    That's not how it works.

    When Floyd fought Oscar, he was everyone's #1 PFP, yet he took way less than a 50/50 split, because Oscar was the one who brought more money to the promotion.

    It's about who brings more money to the table. When Floyd and Pac sit down to negotiate, Floyd is going to point out that Floyd-Oscar did more PPV buys than Pac-Oscar, Floyd-Hatton did more PPV buys than Pac-Hatton, and Floyd-Marquez will likely do more buys than either Pac-Marquez fight. There's no reason for Floyd to take less than 50/50 against Pac.
    Team PAC can always counter PBF's higher PPV numbers by saying that PAC's fights with Hoya and Hatton were during difficult times where there's a current global economic crisis...

    Also I think PBF got a lesser purse split percentage wise in the Hoya fight as compared to the reported 38% that PAC got from Hoya... I don't know the purse split in PBF-Hatton fight...
    .
    Um, sorry, but the biggest selling UFC ppv was Lesnar-Couture, which occured during these exact same economic times. Pacman ain't getting more money than Mayweather. Accept it and move on

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    3,530
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1285
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Arum: "Even a 50/50 split with Floyd and Pac is utter nonsense".

    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SweetPea View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by SaddoBoxer View Post
    PAC is the hottest boxer right now... He should get the lion's share even out of respect for his current status in boxing...
    That's not how it works.

    When Floyd fought Oscar, he was everyone's #1 PFP, yet he took way less than a 50/50 split, because Oscar was the one who brought more money to the promotion.

    It's about who brings more money to the table. When Floyd and Pac sit down to negotiate, Floyd is going to point out that Floyd-Oscar did more PPV buys than Pac-Oscar, Floyd-Hatton did more PPV buys than Pac-Hatton, and Floyd-Marquez will likely do more buys than either Pac-Marquez fight. There's no reason for Floyd to take less than 50/50 against Pac.
    Team PAC can always counter PBF's higher PPV numbers by saying that PAC's fights with Hoya and Hatton were during difficult times where there's a current global economic crisis...

    Also I think PBF got a lesser purse split percentage wise in the Hoya fight as compared to the reported 38% that PAC got from Hoya... I don't know the purse split in PBF-Hatton fight...
    .
    And when Floyd-Marquez does more PPV buys than Pac-Marquez, Floyd can counter by saying that he did more PPVs against Marquez in a bad economy than Pac did against Marquez in a good economy.

    Floyd's not getting less than 50/50 against Pac, and there's no evidence to suggest that he should take less than 50/50.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 61
    Last Post: 07-11-2008, 11:35 PM
  2. Arum: "Pacquaio-Hatton in November 2008"
    By OumaFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 12-19-2007, 11:42 AM
  3. Bob Arum: "Cotto Would Break Mayweather"
    By ICB in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 12-31-2006, 12:45 AM
  4. Arum: "Erik Morales Will Be Stronger, Faster"
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 10-31-2006, 09:44 AM
  5. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-04-2006, 06:16 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing