Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 39

Thread: Froch and Bute agree in principle to a Unification Fight

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,910
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch and Bute agree in principle to a Unification Fight

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post

    Why is that? The winner fights Kessler for a full unification in a pretty deep division.
    It was an off the cuff remark I made after coming home from the bar, I didn't consider the Kessler angle, but sober I wouldn't change much here. It's just that in my opinion these two guys have a low stature. They are very ordinary as champs go. PPV buys would be very low. Now if you can think of any title unification bouts of the past between two fighters of lesser stature than these guys, I'm all ears.
    I guess if by inconsequential you mean the fight won't make money, then sure. But, from a boxing perspective, it would pit the #1 and #2 super middles against eachother and that can't be inconsequential, can it?
    So you are saying that all unification bouts are consequential then from a boxing perspective? or all weight divisions have consequential fighters at the top? I don't. SMW is at the bottom end of the list in terms of quality divisions. And these guys are low profile, this fight will be pretty much ignored except in Britain. But hey, that's just my opinion, you don't have to share it.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1345
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Froch and Bute agree in principle to a Unification Fight

    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by CGM View Post

    It was an off the cuff remark I made after coming home from the bar, I didn't consider the Kessler angle, but sober I wouldn't change much here. It's just that in my opinion these two guys have a low stature. They are very ordinary as champs go. PPV buys would be very low. Now if you can think of any title unification bouts of the past between two fighters of lesser stature than these guys, I'm all ears.
    I guess if by inconsequential you mean the fight won't make money, then sure. But, from a boxing perspective, it would pit the #1 and #2 super middles against eachother and that can't be inconsequential, can it?
    So you are saying that all unification bouts are consequential then from a boxing perspective? or all weight divisions have consequential fighters at the top? I don't. SMW is at the bottom end of the list in terms of quality divisions. And these guys are low profile, this fight will be pretty much ignored except in Britain. But hey, that's just my opinion, you don't have to share it.
    I have to disagree there. SMW is not at the bottom of the list in terms of quality opposition. But, that is a good thread idea. Maybe I'll start one

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 23
    Last Post: 05-12-2009, 08:41 AM
  2. Froch vs Bute?
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-29-2009, 03:44 PM
  3. Replies: 11
    Last Post: 03-24-2009, 06:48 PM
  4. Carl Froch turns down a fight against Bute
    By Maxime1 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 03-21-2007, 10:00 AM
  5. FROCH vs BUTE ... 2007?
    By Hacienda in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-26-2006, 09:30 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing