Berto is dissapointing me

[XaduBoxer]

I wouldn't mind seeing Berto in with the loser of Cotto - Clottey, meaning Clottey. That would be a good test for him.

Since you guys neg repped me by mentioning a possible PAC-Berto fight in this thread, do I have the right to neg rep you for mentioning Cotto, Clottey here?
.

It's not the same thing because: a) We are not trolls, and b) we don't go around mentioning Cotto and/or Clottey in every thread we can, regardless of the subject matter of those threads.

Neg rep away though, it doesn't bother me.

It doesn't bother me either... So better for you to stop giving me neg rep... I just retaliated giving neg rep just the fun of it... I like discussing boxing at the same time having fun...
.

[C-Lo]

I wouldn't mind seeing Berto in with the loser of Cotto - Clottey, meaning Clottey. That would be a good test for him.

Since you guys neg repped me by mentioning a possible PAC-Berto fight in this thread, do I have the right to neg rep you for mentioning Cotto, Clottey here? .

Not at all. CFH doesn't bring them into the threads he posts in. CFH talks about boxing, You talk about Pacquiao.

Like it or not, you have a complete label on you in this forum community.

[XaduBoxer]

I wouldn't mind seeing Berto in with the loser of Cotto - Clottey, meaning Clottey. That would be a good test for him.

Since you guys neg repped me by mentioning a possible PAC-Berto fight in this thread, do I have the right to neg rep you for mentioning Cotto, Clottey here? .

Not at all. CFH doesn't bring them into the threads he posts in. CFH talks about boxing, You talk about Pacquiao.

Like it or not, you have a complete label on you in this forum community.

I think it's a double standard... but no worries, I'm just here to discuss boxing... Neg rep and double standard won't bother me...
.

[Mar]

...what berto did against urango to me was fine. They obviously had the plan to go in there and win not KO the guy. The problem with all the holding is that he didn't need to do it. He could have made the night harder and maybe impress us a lot more but he choose to make an easy night of it get a check and move on. No big deal. Against a guy who he wasn't gonna ko anyway and just threw wild punches with his head down without looking most of the time i would have liked to see more from berto, but after the first two rounds wasn't expecting it. He's picking and choosing his battles and right now with the division so deep and crazy i don't have a prob with that.

[J_Undisputed]

Berto seems to be set to have an advantage over most of his opponents to date. Collazo was alot more game that they thought when they picked him. Urango was very one dimensional as someone said earlier in this thread.
Berto has some speed and ring generalship, but watching him fight... it could be fair to say hes in the wrong business because he seems to go into every fight with a preconcieved idea that he shouldn't be hit. It wasn't a bad fight against Unrago, but very boring to see a guy with a natural advantage in speed and weight maximize that all night but trying to sting a guy with a quick combo for sake of throwing one and then eliminating risk by holding waiting to be separated and reengage from a distance where his speed and ring generalship favored him all over again. I personally don't think Berto is all they are making him out to be and as many of you have said, he doesn't do well against the elite. Berto at this point seems to be a HBO/ Ricardo williams type experiment (Willaim's personal issues aside) and its hard to not see someone stretch this guy with as much real estate as he leaves open down the middle.