Pacquiao ready to accept Mosley's challenge

[Kel]

I consider the fight with Mosley at a catchweight of 144 as the most difficult for PAC at this stage compared to Floyd (@143), JMM (@140) or Cotto (@143)... Props to PAC for considering the most dangerous fight...
.

When did anything you consider mean shit? Your a funny lunatic.

[XaduBoxer]

I consider the fight with Mosley at a catchweight of 144 as the most difficult for PAC at this stage compared to Floyd (@143), JMM (@140) or Cotto (@143)... Props to PAC for considering the most dangerous fight...
.

When did anything you consider mean shit? Your a funny lunatic.

This is a boxing forum... I'm just presenting my own personal opinion... It's up to you how you interpret it if you agree with it or not...

Why don't you rank the 4 (Shane, Floyd, JMM, Cotto) possible opponents for PAC from most dangerous to least dangerous? Do it Mr. Kel...
.

[fan johnny]

Looks like Arum is showing his greedy as face. Why is there always a need to fukdup a deal going good?

Pacquiao expresses interest in Mosley fight | The Fabulous Forum | Los Angeles Times

[C-Lo]

Looks like Arum is showing his greedy as face. Why is there always a need to fukdup a deal going good?

Pacquiao expresses interest in Mosley fight | The Fabulous Forum | Los Angeles Times

I agree. Arum is being a dick right now. He says "they're still looking around for the best deal." A 60/40 split with Shane Mosley is easily the best deal out there.

[fan johnny]

Looks like Arum is showing his greedy as face. Why is there always a need to fukdup a deal going good?

Pacquiao expresses interest in Mosley fight | The Fabulous Forum | Los Angeles Times

I agree. Arum is being a dick right now. He says "they're still looking around for the best deal." A 60/40 split with Shane Mosley is easily the best deal out there.

It's not really the split, I'm sure its not really be a problem for Arum, it's Pacquiao facing another Top Rank fighter. So it means as the Promoter Arum gets two shares for one Mega fight. Mosley is GBP while Cotto is Top Rank, so Arum has to split the Promoter's cut if he fights Mosley. He looks at it from the stand point that if Pacquiao loses there goes the Mega pay. It's a conflict of Interest and Team Pacquiao should kick his ass for standing in the way. Not really, but as a boxing fan that's totally how I feel.

[Kel]

I consider the fight with Mosley at a catchweight of 144 as the most difficult for PAC at this stage compared to Floyd (@143), JMM (@140) or Cotto (@143)... Props to PAC for considering the most dangerous fight...
.

When did anything you consider mean shit? Your a funny lunatic.

This is a boxing forum... I'm just presenting my own personal opinion... It's up to you how you interpret it if you agree with it or not...

Why don't you rank the 4 (Shane, Floyd, JMM, Cotto) possible opponents for PAC from most dangerous to least dangerous? Do it Mr. Kel...
.

It is your opinion and I don't agree with your opinion.

One of the names you mention already beat Pac twice and is facing PBF next.. unless your a complete retard can you understand why I don't need to say anymore?

The other three you mention are Welters but Pac won't fight them at their most effective weight. What is stopping Manny? De La Hoya was such a beast at 147 and he beat him up... yeas? Like tiger with angry teeth!! No?

[fan johnny]

When did anything you consider mean shit? Your a funny lunatic.

This is a boxing forum... I'm just presenting my own personal opinion... It's up to you how you interpret it if you agree with it or not...

Why don't you rank the 4 (Shane, Floyd, JMM, Cotto) possible opponents for PAC from most dangerous to least dangerous? Do it Mr. Kel...
.

It is your opinion and I don't agree with your opinion.

One of the names you mention already beat Pac twice and is facing PBF next.. unless your a complete retard can you understand why I don't need to say anymore?

The other three you mention are Welters but Pac won't fight them at their most effective weight. What is stopping Manny? De La Hoya was such a beast at 147 and he beat him up... yeas? Like tiger with angry teeth!! No?

'Fact', and not 'opinion' is Pacquiao never lost a fight to any of those fighters. Nobody can't change that fact with an opinion. If saying it makes you feel good then go ahead.... feel goood! Saying it ain't a dig to 'nuthuggers' because it's on deaf ears. Marquez drew one fight and lost the other one. 'Fact' not 'Hallucination'

'haters' and 'huggers' whatever... "Get over it!".

[XaduBoxer]

When did anything you consider mean shit? Your a funny lunatic.

This is a boxing forum... I'm just presenting my own personal opinion... It's up to you how you interpret it if you agree with it or not...

Why don't you rank the 4 (Shane, Floyd, JMM, Cotto) possible opponents for PAC from most dangerous to least dangerous? Do it Mr. Kel...
.

It is your opinion and I don't agree with your opinion.

One of the names you mention already beat Pac twice and is facing PBF next.. unless your a complete retard can you understand why I don't need to say anymore?

The other three you mention are Welters but Pac won't fight them at their most effective weight. What is stopping Manny? De La Hoya was such a beast at 147 and he beat him up... yeas? Like tiger with angry teeth!! No?

So what's the problem?? If you want not to include JMM then we'll erase JMM from the list... So among the 3 boxers (Shane, Floyd and Cotto), I consider Shane @144 as the most dangerous opponent for PAC at this stage... Floyd @143 is next and Cotto @143 is the least dangerous... You got a problem with my list (opinion) then show me your list or voice out your opposing opinion... This is a democratic boxing discussion board... You're free to post your opinion as long as it is within the forum rules...
.

[CFH]

This is a boxing forum... I'm just presenting my own personal opinion... It's up to you how you interpret it if you agree with it or not...

Why don't you rank the 4 (Shane, Floyd, JMM, Cotto) possible opponents for PAC from most dangerous to least dangerous? Do it Mr. Kel...
.

It is your opinion and I don't agree with your opinion.

One of the names you mention already beat Pac twice and is facing PBF next.. unless your a complete retard can you understand why I don't need to say anymore?

The other three you mention are Welters but Pac won't fight them at their most effective weight. What is stopping Manny? De La Hoya was such a beast at 147 and he beat him up... yeas? Like tiger with angry teeth!! No?

So what's the problem?? If you want not to include JMM then we'll erase JMM from the list... So among the 3 boxers (Shane, Floyd and Cotto), I consider Shane @144 as the most dangerous opponent for PAC at this stage... Floyd @143 is next and Cotto @143 is the least dangerous... You got a problem with my list (opinion) then show me your list or voice out your opposing opinion... This is a democratic boxing discussion board... You're free to post your opinion as long as it is within the forum rules...
.

There's nothing democratic about this boxing forum. Saddo rules with an iron fist and the Moderators are little more than his henchmen and cronies. It's a cult of personality, not a democracy. Edit: That was sarcastic, though there's really nothing overly democratic about any forum I've been on, including this one.

As for your question, I would have PBF, Mosley, then Cotto in that order as the biggest threats to Pac at any weight.

[XaduBoxer]

It is your opinion and I don't agree with your opinion.

One of the names you mention already beat Pac twice and is facing PBF next.. unless your a complete retard can you understand why I don't need to say anymore?

The other three you mention are Welters but Pac won't fight them at their most effective weight. What is stopping Manny? De La Hoya was such a beast at 147 and he beat him up... yeas? Like tiger with angry teeth!! No?

So what's the problem?? If you want not to include JMM then we'll erase JMM from the list... So among the 3 boxers (Shane, Floyd and Cotto), I consider Shane @144 as the most dangerous opponent for PAC at this stage... Floyd @143 is next and Cotto @143 is the least dangerous... You got a problem with my list (opinion) then show me your list or voice out your opposing opinion... This is a democratic boxing discussion board... You're free to post your opinion as long as it is within the forum rules...
.

There's nothing democratic about this boxing forum. Saddo rules with an iron fist and the Moderators are little more than his henchmen and cronies. It's a cult of personality, not a democracy. Edit: That was sarcastic, though there's really nothing overly democratic about any forum I've been on, including this one.

As for your question, I would have PBF, Mosley, then Cotto in that order as the biggest threats to Pac at any weight.

Thanks for your list... Would you care to specify at what weight PAC will face each boxer? I think the weight, catchweight is a crucial thing...
.

[CFH]

So what's the problem?? If you want not to include JMM then we'll erase JMM from the list... So among the 3 boxers (Shane, Floyd and Cotto), I consider Shane @144 as the most dangerous opponent for PAC at this stage... Floyd @143 is next and Cotto @143 is the least dangerous... You got a problem with my list (opinion) then show me your list or voice out your opposing opinion... This is a democratic boxing discussion board... You're free to post your opinion as long as it is within the forum rules...
.

There's nothing democratic about this boxing forum. Saddo rules with an iron fist and the Moderators are little more than his henchmen and cronies. It's a cult of personality, not a democracy. Edit: That was sarcastic, though there's really nothing overly democratic about any forum I've been on, including this one.

As for your question, I would have PBF, Mosley, then Cotto in that order as the biggest threats to Pac at any weight.

Thanks for your list... Would you care to specify at what weight PAC will face each boxer? I think the weight, catchweight is a crucial thing...
.

With PBF, I don't think the weight matters provided it isn't below 140/142. For Cotto and to a slightly lesser extent Mosley, I think that anything south of 147 is a major problem. I'd have both fights pretty much as pick'ems at 147, though I think Pac would theoretically have an easier time with Cotto than with Mosley.