Sugar Ray Robinson VS Pacman

[brucelee]

Well look at what thread I found at the bottom of this thread. People called me a liar when I said the Pac fans have been comparing him to Sugar Ray Robinson.

This thread went 5 pages and many posters saying yeah he could equal Sugar Ray. It's only about 21 months old. http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...-robinson.html

So man up Pacman fans you guys compared Pac's resume to SRR, might as well speculate who wins. Who wins in this mythical matchup?

BTW, I also heard Pacman fans (not at this forum but other places on the internet) say that Sugar Ray is the less accomplished fighter saying that he only won at 2 weight classes at welterweight and middleweight while Pacman won 4 lineal weight titles and fought at many more weight classes. They always try to shove the 4 lineal weight titles in people's faces and say SRR was the inferior fighter.

SO might as well man up if you have threads that goes 5 pages on this forum comparing the 2 resumes. Might as well speculate who wins.

Look at the dumb fukk who started that thread. That says it all

LOL. I started that thread because of that article I've found. After some thorough discussions with co-pacfans, I ultimately admitted there that he has a long way to go before surpassing or even equalling robinson.

So where's the problem there?

Question is, if Pac destroys Mayweather, Cotto and Mosley (which is indeed a gargantuan task), would he be in the same breathe as Robinson? Or would we always say that no matter what Pac would do or whatever is his accomplishments, he would never be in equal standing with Robinson?

I guess as true boxing fans, we need to be open-minded with the possibility that a modern day boxer may be as great as the boxers of old.

Or is it really wrong to compare Pac and Robinson? This is boxing talk. Hypothetical match-ups are usually done here. I see no problem with discussing and comparing great fighters.