Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 88

Thread: What do you think of Catch weights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Now I won't criticize Pacman for fighting Oscar at 147 because you can't expect Manny to jump 3 weight classes and meet him at 154, but for the Cotto fight where it's 1 weight class and Pacman in my opinion has a good shot of beating Cotto then fight him at 147, fighting someone that's weight drain is a very cowardly move. Don't make the fight if you think you can't beat an opponent at their best with your boxing skills. The fight if made at a catchweight is a farce.
    Assumptions:

    1. Cotto can't beat PAC at 140.
    2. PAC can't beat Cotto at 147.
    3. Cotto can beat PAC at 143/144 and PAC can beat Cotto at 143/144.

    Make the fight at a catchweight of 143/144...
    .

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1447
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Now I won't criticize Pacman for fighting Oscar at 147 because you can't expect Manny to jump 3 weight classes and meet him at 154, but for the Cotto fight where it's 1 weight class and Pacman in my opinion has a good shot of beating Cotto then fight him at 147, fighting someone that's weight drain is a very cowardly move. Don't make the fight if you think you can't beat an opponent at their best with your boxing skills. The fight if made at a catchweight is a farce.
    Assumptions:

    1. Cotto can't beat PAC at 140.
    2. PAC can't beat Cotto at 147.
    3. Cotto can beat PAC at 143/144 and PAC can beat Cotto at 143/144.

    Make the fight at a catchweight of 143/144...
    .
    After seeing the fight against Oscar and how strong Pac looked as a Welter, why couldn't he beat Cotto at 147?

  3. #3
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Now I won't criticize Pacman for fighting Oscar at 147 because you can't expect Manny to jump 3 weight classes and meet him at 154, but for the Cotto fight where it's 1 weight class and Pacman in my opinion has a good shot of beating Cotto then fight him at 147, fighting someone that's weight drain is a very cowardly move. Don't make the fight if you think you can't beat an opponent at their best with your boxing skills. The fight if made at a catchweight is a farce.
    Assumptions:

    1. Cotto can't beat PAC at 140.
    2. PAC can't beat Cotto at 147.
    3. Cotto can beat PAC at 143/144 and PAC can beat Cotto at 143/144.

    Make the fight at a catchweight of 143/144...
    .
    After seeing the fight against Oscar and how strong Pac looked as a Welter, why couldn't he beat Cotto at 147?
    That's the general assumption that PAC can't beat Cotto at 147...
    .

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1447
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post

    Assumptions:

    1. Cotto can't beat PAC at 140.
    2. PAC can't beat Cotto at 147.
    3. Cotto can beat PAC at 143/144 and PAC can beat Cotto at 143/144.

    Make the fight at a catchweight of 143/144...
    .
    After seeing the fight against Oscar and how strong Pac looked as a Welter, why couldn't he beat Cotto at 147?
    That's the general assumption that PAC can't beat Cotto at 147...
    .
    Who assumes that? I haven't heard that from anyone.

  5. #5
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post

    After seeing the fight against Oscar and how strong Pac looked as a Welter, why couldn't he beat Cotto at 147?
    That's the general assumption that PAC can't beat Cotto at 147...
    .
    Who assumes that? I haven't heard that from anyone.
    Really?? Try to browse more threads/postings here...

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1447
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post

    That's the general assumption that PAC can't beat Cotto at 147...
    .
    Who assumes that? I haven't heard that from anyone.
    Really?? Try to browse more threads/postings here...
    Experts though? Many fans on here assumed Pacquiao couldn't beat Hatton.

  7. #7
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post

    Who assumes that? I haven't heard that from anyone.
    Really?? Try to browse more threads/postings here...
    Experts though? Many fans on here assumed Pacquiao couldn't beat Hatton.
    We have experts here too... What can you label to those guys who said PAC will inflict the worst beating ever to Hatton??
    .

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    People are now using the odlh fight why pac should fight cotto at 147. But they seem to ignore the fact that pac started fighting at 106.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    999
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinito View Post
    People are now using the odlh fight why pac should fight cotto at 147. But they seem to ignore the fact that pac started fighting at 106.
    What's your point? Roberto Duran started his career at 122, but that didnt' stop him from being a jr. middleweight and middleweight champion. Roy Jones JR. started his career at 154 and that didn't stop him from being heavyweight champion.

    Stop with the excuses for catch weights. It seems like only Pac fans are defending catch weights almost everyone else disapproves of it.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. When will the war catch up with Cotto?
    By littlebif in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  2. Catch Me Up
    By amat in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 06:22 PM
  3. is this not the greatest catch ever seen?
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 02:30 AM
  4. Anyone catch the Berto fight?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 07:32 PM
  5. anyone else catch the beef
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 01:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing