You don't put 147 on your PAC-COTTO poll, yet you put 147 on the JMM-Cotto poll.
WHAT A FAG.
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Kick his ass Sea Bass!
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
You don't put 147 on your PAC-COTTO poll, yet you put 147 on the JMM-Cotto poll.
WHAT A FAG.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Banned
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Perhaps it's because of his obvious aversion to JMM, who as we all know, has proven himself a better boxer than Manny over 24 rounds. He wants nothing more than to see JMM in over his head and offers the opportunity to vote that way. However, when it comes to precious little Manny the choices are limited and are only there to sway you to Xaduboxers line of thinking. Which is basically catch weight or nothing.Originally Posted by boozeboxer
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Why bring PAC on this thread??You a PacNutSucker? ...
.
Kick his ass Sea Bass!
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
Last edited by boozeboxer; 06-19-2009 at 12:46 AM. Reason: After being edited bymy peers, alterations have been made in bold. Thanks for all the help.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
don't forget to add ignorant chickenshit on there
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
Old Guard
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Not possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Not possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!
That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...
Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage?
.
...i want poptarts
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
dumbass thinks he's Jesus Christ lolNot possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...
It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!
That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...
Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage?
.
Just a dude in blue.
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Wow....Spam-boxer is falling offNot possible to do when the gonads are occupied by you...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
Woah! I thought my post on him was bad...
It's funny because he's the reason people's rep points have been going up. I guess we should thank him. Each time someone makes fun of him, they get repped by everyone who wants him out of here. And that's A LOT OF PEOPLE!
That's what I told you on the other thread that you should be grateful to me for making you a better person... but sadly you don't believe me...
Off-Topic: BTW, how's your right hand Mr. C-Lo? Are the calluses on your right hand not hurting anymore from the over usage?
..Merit negs on that.Better eat your wheaties
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Watch your language dude and your blood pressure... Calm down...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
I already answered you why I intentionally left out the poll option "PAC-Cotto at 147" on the other thread... Hurry go to that thread now so that your suspicious mind will be cleared up... It will be good for your blood pressure too...
.
Kick his ass Sea Bass!
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Watch your language dude and your blood pressure... Calm down...
Why bring PAC on this thread??
.
You ass. You fucking moron. I called you out on leaving Pac-Cotto at 147 on your other "poll." And yet you put JMM-Cotto at 147 as an option. Do you really think we are that stupid??
You ignorant chickenshit.
You would have Pac fight Calderon at 160 if you could. What a bitch.
I have never seen someone that was such a pathetic excuse for a poster or a fan.
I already answered you why I intentionally left out the poll option "PAC-Cotto at 147" on the other thread... Hurry go to that thread now so that your suspicious mind will be cleared up... It will be good for your blood pressure too...
.
I already read that thread (as has everyone else) and the logical conclusion is that:
a.) you have much more faith in JMM that you do on Pac
b.) that you are so biased you can't see the forest for pac's testes.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
To sums it up in 5 words: terrible mismatch due to size.
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Re: At what weight JMM should face Cotto if ever they fight?
Well said, terrible mismatch due to size.... Guess you voted "JMM should not fight Cotto at all ever..." ...
.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks